On June 02, 2021 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Doe, Jane Bns,
and
Barstow Unified School District,
Doe 1,
Does 2 To 100,
for Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
\J
CM-015
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stats Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
_“
JENNY R. LOURO (State Bar NO. 306535)
MANLY STEWART FINALDI
19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 800
Irvine, California 92612 F I LED
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA
TELEPHONE No; (949) 252-9990 FAX No‘ (Optional): (949) 252-9991 COUNTY 0F SAN Benumowo
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): jlour0@man1ystewal’t.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): JANE BNS DOE JUN 12 2023
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
STREET ADDRESS: 247 West 3rd Street
MAILING ADDRESS: Same
Kéfimm
BY: Rifia Phillips. Deputy
CITY AND ZIP CODE: San Bemardino 924 1 5
BRANCH NAME: Central Courthouse
CASE NUMBER:
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: JANE BNS DOE
CIVSB21 15713
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: BARSTOW UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et a1. JUDICIAL OFFICER:
Hon. Donald Alvarez
DEPT.:
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
$23
Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above.
1. a. Title: JANE BAA DOE, et a1. V. BARSTOW UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et a1.
b. Case number: CIVSB2227305
c. Court: same as above
d. Department:
E other state or federal court
$24
(name and address):
e. Casetype: E limited civil unlimited civil D probate D familylaw E other(specify):
_—h
Filing date: December 7, 2022
:(Q
Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?"
Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check
E
all
Yes
that apply):
-No
involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims.
arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination
of j
the same
E or substantially identical questions of law or fact.
involveé claims against, title to. possession of, or damages to the same property.
is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication ofjudicial resources
i. Status ofcase:
D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h
if heard by different judges.
pending
E
E
dismissed
disposed of by judgment
D with E withoutprejudice
2. a. Title:
b. Case number:
c. Court: E
E
same as above
other state or federal court (name and address):
d. Department:
Page 1 of 3
Form Approved for Optional Use
Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3,300
CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] www.courflnfo.ca.gov
@
m
<
2
mS
L.
0
3
Document Filed Date
June 12, 2023
Case Filing Date
June 02, 2021
Category
Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
\J CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stats Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY _“ JENNY R. LOURO (State Bar NO. 306535) MANLY STEWART FINALDI 19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 800 Irvine, California 92612 F I LED SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE No; (949) 252-9990 FAX No‘ (Optional): (949) 252-9991 COUNTY 0F SAN Benumowo E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): jlour0@man1ystewal’t.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): JANE BNS DOE JUN 12 2023 SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO STREET ADDRESS: 247 West 3rd Street MAILING ADDRESS: Same Kéfimm BY: Rifia Phillips. Deputy CITY AND ZIP CODE: San Bemardino 924 1 5 BRANCH NAME: Central Courthouse CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: JANE BNS DOE CIVSB21 15713 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: BARSTOW UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et a1. JUDICIAL OFFICER: Hon. Donald Alvarez DEPT.: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE $23 Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: JANE BAA DOE, et a1. V. BARSTOW UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et a1. b. Case number: CIVSB2227305 c. Court: same as above d. Department: E other state or federal court $24 (name and address): e. Casetype: E limited civil unlimited civil D probate D familylaw E other(specify): _—h Filing date: December 7, 2022 :(Q Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check E all Yes that apply): -No involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of j the same E or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involveé claims against, title to. possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication ofjudicial resources i. Status ofcase: D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h if heard by different judges. pending E E dismissed disposed of by judgment D with E withoutprejudice 2. a. Title: b. Case number: c. Court: E E same as above other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3,300 CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] www.courflnfo.ca.gov @ m < 2 mS L. 0 3