arrow left
arrow right
  • SHARON ALLEN VS. RELATED MANAGEMENT CO. ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • SHARON ALLEN VS. RELATED MANAGEMENT CO. ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • SHARON ALLEN VS. RELATED MANAGEMENT CO. ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • SHARON ALLEN VS. RELATED MANAGEMENT CO. ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • SHARON ALLEN VS. RELATED MANAGEMENT CO. ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • SHARON ALLEN VS. RELATED MANAGEMENT CO. ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • SHARON ALLEN VS. RELATED MANAGEMENT CO. ET AL FRAUD document preview
  • SHARON ALLEN VS. RELATED MANAGEMENT CO. ET AL FRAUD document preview
						
                                

Preview

| San Francisco County Superior Court AUG - 9 2023 pg fe Mead i dpric GOURT ix of kon. uty Clerk R95 ZS 605806 =f EW, ONE To ENO CGCTL SUPPORT ARS oO SHARON ALL ADAY! ENOMENT wurtSu SOO JOHN tJA AE DOES, OTION ALONGWs Cem C242 ) To coOmPLA! ENDANTS UBSI TI V FORT! TITIOUS = ue WA E CAS eo ys E LAW. MEMO OF ANAGEMENT V. e NAME AN’ ELATEO M LP, 56 AUTHOAITIES. fe 10 SALLE PoInTS AND Pogslh ohANOHERB14 do. AND [ju ESE RWATION SX AN ONE == STAC SOLO. 500 OHM EJAWE DOES. 12 =e, ye» SHARON ALLEN. 13 14 15 OTH THE PLAINTIFF ADVOCATE, REPRESEN 5 SPeA ER AND ASS! ERE L GNORANT OF STATEO STANT Me (SELF THAT TACT UM BO THE SY SO 16 7s (DEFENDANT; ESIGNATEO- iE VENAME!S, DE FE NDANTS LAI, AND OD NDANTS TRUENVAMES Sy 17 COM icTIT10VU $ NAME. ) THAT DEF ESULT BOTH P. LAL MOVE THIS COURT BEEN DISCOVERED A NO Th ~ 18 ECTF UL ASSISTANT HEREBY RESP.OWS gut © jo OVOCATE TO AMENDTHE COM TAS FOLL LBA NO LAUEMAMES LAIN SAL 09 20 ELATED MAWA GE ENT COMPAN ES ONSE UBSTIUTE ESERVATIO LP AND BYTHE S AME” PARTM! ERSHIP, +0 ) | 21 LATE MA NA GE M s¢ 22 teTiTi0us WA MES’R MA NA GE M COANOLA SALLE ApT., CORPORATIO. N, RE LATI VE Efe. . 4 SWORN AND ALSO S23 UILOINGC J, LEX COM AN b RD YO AUG. yEAR 202 DA 3 B YMEMYNAME in a" 24 SuBCRIGED THIS ON THE BEHAL F OF PLAINTIFF RU? RTIME + CONSIDERATION. —~ 26 9. SHARON ALLEN, THANKS Post lo” uting Defendant's True Name for. Amendment to .Complaint-Substit X O27 “Fietitious Name [Code' Civ. —— Proc. $474) 1 28 HE above, is for use asjan amendment to.a complaint to substitute the ue name of a derendant for the.fictitious name by-Which that:defendant was.sued [sée Code Civ: Proc. § 474]. The. form-may-be adapted for.use-as an: atnendment to'a créss Py prone Cesnaien oy complaint: or: 4 ‘petition | Proper caption. Hear S. randy ‘use cof he t When a defendant is sued by a fictiti jous name and the true name is sub: ey discovered, leading or proceeding st be amended §4 ‘ode Civ. ff Prdc..'§474 coni A. ive court be filing owe’ have videdfe leave, coun: should ine, whe érk requ ire J befe S filing the amendment. Some courts have printed forms that should be used . _ purpose [for illustrations of some of those forms, see §§ 21.66, 2 67}. by oe [3]. Fictitious Name Alle; Req nt o requi ements of ‘Code Civ. Proc. § 4m ‘are mandatory, inch nding. the. require- a ment that the complaint allege the pla rit+f 's i norance of the true name of a defendant [Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. Superior Court (1984).160 Cal. App. 3d 504, 598, 206 ‘ Cal. Rptr. 654]. A plaintiff is not allowed to substitute the true name of. party for a fictitious name if the plaintiff was not igno! in the true name whehe dompiaint was filed [Code Civ. of t 75 Cal. App. 4th 169, 177-180, Proc. § 474; see, e.g., Woo vy: Superior Court (1999) v. Drost (1993) 20 Cal. 89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 20 (dec! lining to follow Balon v. Drost); B alon Optical Surplus, App. 4th 483, 488-490, 25 Cal. Rptr. 2d 12 (allowing amendment); 84, 279 Cal. Rptr. 194]. Inc. v, Superior Court (1991) 228 Cal. App. '3d:776, 782-7of the defendant sued by a reer thovigh thé-plaiitiff knows of the e: xistence her name), the plaintiff s name, and the defendant's actual identity (i.e oF she lacks , his or know see es t? within is “ignoranconne the case or with hi her injuries. Ign of the facts person’s ction with e, required by: Code, Civ, Proc.:§ 474, and piving.ise,to a cause. of action is.the know: of facts?” not questionis dig, ay that j aintiff had a.c nse af, actin those facts?” [GeneralCal. Motors Rptr, 2d ye 871; Superior Court (1996) 48 Cal. App. . 4th 580, 593-594, 755Cal. App. 4th 368, 373 McClatchy v. Coblentz, Patch, Duffy& Bass, LLP (2016) 24 irm as a Doe.defendant (after plaintiff sought to sul stitute a deceased attorney’s law-f ed the firm’s motion to grant - pursuant to Code Civ. Proc, § 474, the trial court properly the trial court's ported quash service: of..summons; where substantial, evidence sup he was not ignorant of the n when plaintiff filed the origi inal petitio n, determinatiothat were based)]. For further discussion of what . fact igi his on1 which claims against the firm see Ch. 20, Allegations Commonly consti Use 1 ince” of a defend ant's name, ht fe tof h ay us’ “ (Code Civ. “A laind the com 474 ible” délay SS yin “thie de: 198 3) 144’ Cal suffered -Apy 3d 1; 9-10, 1 CalRptr a 380 USS! of delay, see §.21.14] (2) 1 it " fs) Gross References te ne For discussion of the form of amended pleadings rally, seé § 21 For forms for use in suing a defend a : ny & ea em Allegations OCA TE. Sate Commonly. Used HARONA LE FF pieiat NTA ai N AMO HER ADV WHERETORE® ‘PLAINTI 5S| A E 5 hy Ms ¥,Sr LE tare Page Geh Hl OSIM,E, aoe GeBL AINTLFF E OF CALIFO HONORA BLOFE COSTURATTE ROO . DEP. ft Veet Ss, ARON ALLENS i eee RANTANO ORDER AMEMOMENT OF Comp INT: He lov . Jy ovoln Lo further RL, Cf fe 2E0 mie CorecLion surerd, amracle ofcomple ZEA Q Tiny an An "pe SHARON HLLEW's Gk Vote \\ Machericbed) ot BG Ci Piha. 3R0 aay Load yor 2 Ut fame 0 Te thon You Era Be Weck Arey Yo Flame ref, Dage®2A Be ee BE PLD-PI-001 [ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY 1 SHARON ALLEN EKO. S225 BER Ry St? 32l . STCA.9YIS 8B. .” PER). PLAIN? SHRON AL LEW. (IW PRO ‘TELEPHONE wor g: £08- 71 76 ° FAX NO. (Optional: E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): . ATTORNEY FOR (Name): SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAAY STREET ADDRESS: YOoMcALLI STER ST. FRANCIECO. MAILING ADDRESS: orvanoz cove Sf CA. 9410 2 srancH name: CL Y/L. ONG- FUL EVICTION E¢AL- PLAINTIFE: SHAROA/A LLEN,/ 70 500J A TED MANAGEMENT LALA S LE PRE: SERVATION, £ DEFENDANT:RE/A P- [71 voes 10 SO0- + STACY SOLOMANTUNITEDIEGAL. c COMPLAINT—Personal Injury, Property Dai [] AMENDED (Number): CONTINUAL. Type (check all that apply): OF ACTION,AM END, OBETILE D + neeey au sieves CASE NUMBER: [_] MOTOR VEHICLE OTHER (specify): WROFuN G LEV IC- Property Damage [7 Wrongful Death (H]_ Personal Injury 1) Other Damages FLOM AWILRIGHT S, ' + COWSPI RACY, JYTH Jurisdiction (check all that apply): JHE Al CO ACT [] ACTION Is A LIMITED civiL cASEAMENOM ENTOU E, Amount demanded does not exceed $10,000 CHILOIM! exceeds $10,000, but does not exceed $25,000 baNGeReNT CIYIL [1 ACTION IS AN UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE (exceeds $25,000) RIGHTS ACT © [C_] ACTION IS RECLASSIFIED by this amended complaint 196 e [] from limited to unlimited [] from unlimited to limited 4. Plaintiff (name ornames): SHARON ALLEN, / 70 500 JOHNFJANE DOES, JOCE Youn G& . | alleges causes of action against defendant (name or name: S, RELATED MANAGEMEWTLP # LA SALLEP aw RESERVATI ONLP t UNITED - LEGALESTACYSOLOMAN as iL 2. This pleading, including attachments and exhibits, consists of the following number of page WELL OVER SEVERALSE fe é 3. Each plaintiff named above is a competent adult ES + CAUSES Of — . a. [__] except plaintiff (name): V.ALSO | a ALONG: WITH 23 AT AC (41) [) a corporation qualified ‘to do business in California (2) [_] an unincorporated entity (describe): HERETO EXHI13/TS « (3) [__] a public entity (describe): (4) (_] a minor ([) an adult "gga (2) [_] for whom a guardian or conservator of the estate or a guardian ad litem has been appointed (b) [J other (specify): : (5) [__] other (specify): Maa SHARON ALLEN ' b. [_] except plaintiff (name): (1) [_] a corporation qualified to do. business in California (2) [] an unincorporated entity (describe): (3) [__] a public entity (describe): (4) [Ja minor (-) an adult (a) [-_] for whom a guardian or conservator of the estate or a guardian ad litem has been appointed (b) [] other (specify): 4 (5) Ee) other (specify): Poe"! of 133, [J Information about additional plaintiffs who are not competent adults is shown in Attachment 3. Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use COMPLAINT—Personal Injury, Property Code of Civil Procedure, § 425.12 Judicial Council of California www.courts.ca.gov PLO-PI-001 [Rev. January 1, 2007] Damage, Wrongful Death EE OO PLD-PI-001 short ime: ALLEN ¢ ALL HER RELATIVE MAWAGEM Et 0) case NuMBER: SHARON CHILDREN. » VS. +4 SALLE ApAR IMENT S. 4. (_] Plaintiff (name). is doing business under the fictitious name (specify). and has complied with the fictitious business name laws. 5. Each defendant named above is a natural person a. [__] except defendant (name). c. C7 except defendant (name): RELA vE MANAGE -- (1) (_] a business organization, form unknown (1) (J a business organization, form unknown (2) _] a corporation (2) [J a corporation ¢ J A SALLE PRESERVATION (3) [J an unincorporated entity (describe). (3) [J an unincorporated entity (describe): LP t ONE TO FOV SOLOMAN, (4) [_] a public entity (describe). (4) [__] a public entity (describe). sie SOLO 5) (_] other (specify) (8) [] other (specify). UNITED LEGA b. [-_] except defendant (name): d. [[_] except defendant (name): (1) [J a business organization, form unknown 1) [) a business organization, form unknown (2) (__] a corporation (2) [-] a corporation (3) [J an unincorporated entity (aéserite)- (3) [_] an unincorporated entity (describe). (4) [J a public entity (describe). (4) [_] a public entity (describe). (5) [__] other (specify). 5) [__] other (specify). [-_] Information about additional defendants who are not natural persons is contained in Attachment 5. 6. The true’names of defendants sued as Does are unknown to plaintiff. a. [7 Doe defendants (specify Doe numbers): / fo S00 ct MORE were the agents or employees of other named defendants and acted within the Ifo of that agency or employment. O [-) Doe defendants (specify Doe numbers): [to 500 cr MORE. are persons whose capacities are unknown to RELATEOMANAGEMEN FOL plaintiff. re ~m Defendants who:are joined under Code of Civil Procedure section 382 are (names): LA SALLE PRESERVATION, LP + UNITEOLEGAL + STACY SOLOMAM. 8. This court is the proper court because a at least one defendant now resides in its jurisdictional area. 2 b. the principal place of business of a defendant corporation or unincorporated association is in its jurisdictional area. c. d. injury to person or damage to personal property occurred in ae isdictional area. other (specify): JHE DE FEM OANT LA SA LLA PRESERY. Tow, (APT. BUILDIWG ‘tide iE SAME RESPONSE, iE nena ee tr Bulbine COMpLeEX. 1S Locd DIN THE CI + COU. oF SAW FIR Hie CO, LP THE,a «DEFENDANT RiRELATIVE ‘A dei co ACODEFE) NOMI MANAG ING- LA SALLE. PRESERVATION £ Pp WHICH iS VERYLAR 9. [WJ Plaintiff is required to comply wi itih a claims statute, and a. [| has complied with applicable claims statutes, or b. [_] is excused from complying because (specify). Page” 2K"133 PLD-P1-001 [Rev. January 1, 2007] COMPLAINT—Personal Injury, Property Page 2 of 3 Damage, Wrongful Death ’ : PLD-PI-001 SHORT TITLE: L RELATIVEMANAGEMEN7 Pee sonoen. ALLEN+ALHER SHAROW CHILOREW., VS. #/ASALLEApARTYENES - 10. The following causes of action are attached and the statements above apply to each (each complaint must have one or more causes of action attached): a. . [__] Motor Vehicle . D7] General Negligence . (H) Intentional Tort |. [__] Products Liability , GENERAL NEGLIGENCE OF CONTRACTUL e. . [7] Premises Liability FR, A UO, RE — 6 964 eH14 T Ree f. [4 otter (specify): BREAC H T10N, + WRONGF EVICTION- CIVILRIGHTS ACT F IO) ANGERMENT, NUISANC CONST, PIRACY, LHTHAMENOMENOVE C. E, THE RICOAC RES ON DENTS. U 1, Plaintiff has suffere PERIOR no . [_] wage loss . [7] loss of use of property . [J hospital and medical expenses . [7] general damage . [7] property damage a loss of earning capacity other damage tone ENTEWTI OWA L TvFLi ch On oF EMch ONMALDISSTRESS . | - SHOT 12.1] The damages claimed for wrongful death and the relationships of laintiff to the deceased are 2. [1] listed in Attachment 12.77 E MOTHER V- FATHER © ¥KILLEO p VAINTIFE CHILD JocE AMERI CAN SERIOR FEMALE b. [A7 as follows: yo UNG ANO THE PROCESS, A COURT A Ppo WRONG. RELATIVES WILL eh DE I=, INTED.INVESTIGATOR BLACK SKIN COLORAFRICAN — MED tDISCOVEREDAFIER ~ WILL BE NEEOED. NOTE} | DISCOVER ¥SAID MA LE DIED B AU SEOFMICE ¢ RAT-INFESTATIOV/VHER CLri7, 6 Fi E, THE ABOVE : 43.The relief sought in this complaint is within the jurisdiction of this court, ) ON THE GRO UNDSTHAT: a ' P. FE j Wine SHAROVALLEN ¢ HERCHILOREN PLAINAF: HAS SOFFEREO+ STILL ay FTER ALLIN BECAUSE SEVE, L GUN SHOFS FIREO INTHEIR 3 BED RT MENSANO FAG (E PLAINT] EN SHOT UPAS WEL "S Motor VEHICLE HA FRONT OF FRONT Al OS BED ‘oon, IN FRANCISCO. Book AREA CTABOVE.S: meni it for costs of Suit; for Ag FONT is Ald TAK EW PEA le; EAN SSA a. (1) [7] compensatory damages (2) D7) punitive damages The amount of damages is (in cases for personal injury or wrongful death, you must check (1)): (1) [7] according to proof (2) in the amount of:. $ 2-SMILLI OW PER CAUSE oF Acho 415. The paragraphs of this complaint alleged on information and belief are as follows (speciwy paragraph numbers): IE DEFENDANT ARE RECKLESS DEMONSTRATING. DISREGUARD FORALL PLAINTIFFS “ esT | on “pe aie L, E, ALL VER BLE ¢ DOCUMENT E ‘STBYTHE PLAINTIFF; O REQUE. [ARON ALLEW AN: Oo # SEMA TIVE M SEL F. ate: PAIRED AL ‘GAD! V7 WA Zr Bacaets FdiconLe- L VIO. LATIONS, rE GUESTING ALL BULLET YOLES "fouite NOANTS WUH-INTENTIONALINTENT, RE- VESE O+ FAILEO. SHA RONA LLEM 3 , (TYPE OR PRINT IGNATYRE OF Seer MICHAEL DECAR o WRIGHT. ° Bu PLD-PL00$ [Rev saruary 1, 2007) COMPLAINT—Personal . injury, Property Damage, Wrongful Death Fage'39h 1193. ° Page 3 of 3 For your protection and privacy, please press the Clear This Form button after you have printed the form. | Print this: form | [ Save this form | EE SO ee oe PLD-PI-001(3) SHORT TITLE: HER /RELATIVE MANAGEMENT Co. + ALLE¥ N CASE NUMBER SHARON ix1DS., VS/LASALLEAPT. BUILDINGSO CAUSE OF ACTION—Intentional Tort Page (number) ATTACHMENT TO [7] Complaint [J Cross - Complaint GIE MILLER ONETO 500 DOES _ (Use a separate cause of action form for each cause of actiol on {T-1. Plaintiff (name): $ HA ROW AL L EN, MAR Com Pp LEX¢TH E¥ eB Paps LARGE A ft7 BUILDING ‘A TION. L PWHICHTSA THE MANA be MENTOF A alleges that defendan' rans: ~ LA SALLE: PRES: Bul LOINGy + UNI feb RELATIVE MANA A Does STACY SOLOMAN LEGAL: OVA L was the legal (proximate) cause of damages to plaintiff. By the following acts or omissions to act, defendant intentional te PROJECTED cH TE LAW RIGHTS VIOLATEO- For THE — laintift St HARON ALLE. MV A IER KIOS ¢ WELL OVER SO ADDITI A TH cau: PAVE gama: pas “ANTS S-m MAINT: TF 4 THEVERA ate) WELL 5 (place): fh El YEARS THE DEFENDANTS CAUSED ALLOF THE OVER TO LIVE WI BOTH MICE + RAT LNTESTATION. EN TACT ALL OFTHE DEMON STHeden oe 7H.or Sai FIRST TRAWS ACTION OF BUSSINE: SS OEFEMDENT. THA T SUT HE Yi THE DE FEN OANTS WERE Me NOT¥ STILL VO 7 FA PROV EO aun TA DEAL ING IN GooO FAITH + NEV Ei, HAD =NTIONS OV EACHING A — LE GAL AGREEMENT ON THIS ON 7 THE DEFENQANTSS WITH [4/~ E GR TENT FAILEOTO INFORM + TELL THAT & BED ROOM A ARTMENT UNT-THAT THE LAINTIFE WAS MOVIN G INTO WAS + HAS —-: ASO R MICE +R Ti ESTATION, 7 US BAO-FAITH OZALIN G CAUSE THE PLAINTI F S,SH AROVALLEW ¥ HER KIOS To—_ Hs iHOuSE Ht FINO THE HARO We A AFTER MOVING INTO THE ALREA 0 SAIO FIVE BE THERE AFTER , Al. L AINTUFE- WE TH MATOR f NFESTATION ENT UN: 17, SHOR NIG: FOUVO T THe ‘A 8: oom APART ~ oF B hi MICELR: ATS. WELL OVER Bee! ALM - Ou WERE CompLarwTS WERE RESPECTF¢ ERSHIP $ THEIR CO-O) 4 U. ere SEOTO BoTH OEFEN DAWTS EN DAN DDRES: T, THE AteHS THE LA SALLE PRESERVATION LIMITED PA 1% ELATIVE APARTMENT BUILDING AT A ‘o 5 ABOVE SAID we con D RIGHTS £ s VIOLATION o THE PLAINTIFFS STA ERTAIN ING NM OANTS, THe!HE Si ATED E E, To OTH mic + RAT IW: E TA STATION, 4, DEMON E 0; Prete VATION LIMITE: LLEA ENT UILDING CoM RELATIVE MANAGEMENT COMPANY 18 MOT RINERSHIP. THE ow PLA! NTT 0, FFS wa E | CO* DEFENDANT LINFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DIS ¥ HE! K10S ONTHE GROUNDS THAT SHARON ALLEN ESS SUFTERED BYTHE PRO- 3 “THIS HOUSING JECT LOCATION 15 LOCATED BYA VER HIGH CRIME AREA + AS A RESULT A LOT OF — SHOOTINGOF GUN SHOTS SPELLS vER TO THE LASALLE A 4ARTMENT BUILD /VG- COMPLE X ¥AS A ADDITIONAL ‘SULT, THE PLAINTIFF: S, SHARON UNI TH. EIR FIVEC5) BED 004 HOUSING HAS BE. EW FTHE SHOT. IT WELL OVER EVERAL! he Ei Me HER ! 10 API. 7M ES LEAVING ULLET HOLES TH THE WALLS © ESPON SAIO S BED Room SE THE LAINTT FES’ APE, UNIT WHERE THE PLAINTI FFG LIVE + BY THE SAME f AODOITIOVAL BULLET HOLE S RSONAL PROPE WAS SHOT Y; AS ELL LEAVING TNS(DE THE PLAINTIFFS, SHARON: LLENV+ HER KIOS K, HOME. THE MOTHER OF THE ALREAO, SAID PLAINTIFF OF K10 SHA To THE CRIME LOCATION Come § CALLED QI INORDE THE SANFRANCISCO PoliGE ¢ DOCUMENT THETA E'S dish S THA TWAS ALL — OREOVER Is$ ESAID SF, Poli HAVE GOT KI/EO ° / % te Fu TH ER EX, LAIN S.THE VERY HIGY LEVEL OF EMOTIOWAL IN: LIC RE ai WITH INTE EMON. LW ETA “BECAUSE ALL OF HE PLAINTI FFS UE FCORRECTCopy OF THE 2° 6° 20al VLD LICE EporT _ ¥ she Chibi?” R SPECTFULLY CHEas| HERETO+ CALLE Viva. t ALL