On November 19, 2020 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Frank, Chad,
Frank, Kerri,
and
Tawse, Amber,
for Inj/Damage-Motor Vehicle >$200,000
in the District Court of Montgomery County.
Preview
RECEIVED AND FILED
FOR RECORD
12/14/2022 at 10:00 AM
Melisa Miller, District Clerk
CAUSE NO. 20-11-14219
Montgomery County, Texas
CHAD FRANK; KERRI FRANK § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
VS. § MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS
AMBER TAWSE 28474 JUDICIAL DISTRICT
ORDER DENYING CONTINUANCE
On this day, the Court considered the parties’ 4** Agreed Motion for Continuance,
seeking another continuance in this older-than-two-years case in order to “finish discovery and
participate in a fruitful mediation.” There is no description of what discovery remains undone or
why it remains undone, nor is there any description about how mediation could not have been
done in the last 25 months. Further to the point, if the parties agree that some discovery needs to
be done, then they can agree to do it and on an expedited basis. Likewise, if the parties wish to
go to mediation, they should go. But none of this presents good cause for the Court to continue
this case for a fourth time. It is:
ORDERED that the parties’ Agreed Motion for Continuance is DENIED.
12/14/2022 10:00:01 AM
Signed
KRI N BAYS
Presiding Judge - 284" District Court
Document Filed Date
December 14, 2022
Case Filing Date
November 19, 2020
Category
Inj/Damage-Motor Vehicle >$200,000
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
RECEIVED AND FILED FOR RECORD 12/14/2022 at 10:00 AM Melisa Miller, District Clerk CAUSE NO. 20-11-14219 Montgomery County, Texas CHAD FRANK; KERRI FRANK § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. § MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS AMBER TAWSE 28474 JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORDER DENYING CONTINUANCE On this day, the Court considered the parties’ 4** Agreed Motion for Continuance, seeking another continuance in this older-than-two-years case in order to “finish discovery and participate in a fruitful mediation.” There is no description of what discovery remains undone or why it remains undone, nor is there any description about how mediation could not have been done in the last 25 months. Further to the point, if the parties agree that some discovery needs to be done, then they can agree to do it and on an expedited basis. Likewise, if the parties wish to go to mediation, they should go. But none of this presents good cause for the Court to continue this case for a fourth time. It is: ORDERED that the parties’ Agreed Motion for Continuance is DENIED. 12/14/2022 10:00:01 AM Signed KRI N BAYS Presiding Judge - 284" District Court