arrow left
arrow right
  • BRINSON-V- SOCAL PACIFIC MF MANAGEMENT CORP Print Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited  document preview
  • BRINSON-V- SOCAL PACIFIC MF MANAGEMENT CORP Print Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited  document preview
  • BRINSON-V- SOCAL PACIFIC MF MANAGEMENT CORP Print Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited  document preview
  • BRINSON-V- SOCAL PACIFIC MF MANAGEMENT CORP Print Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

D W F i LE CALIFOR W SUPERIOR COURT OF ROGER M M AN SUKHANI (SBN 164463) COUNTY OF SAN BERNAEI ”"TNPT rmansukhani@grsm. com sAN E’H‘NAWVW IAN G WILLIAMSON (SBN: 185740) FEB 2 4 ZQZZ igwilliamson@grsm. com DAN QUON (SBN: 321532) dquon@grsm.com Amy»)... BY EPUTY GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP LAURA BRUCK ‘ L» 101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000 DCQOUIhUJN San Diego, CA 92 l 01 Telephone: (619) 696—6700 Facsimile: (619) 696-7124 Attorneys for Defendant SOCAL PACIFIC MF MANAGEMENT CORP, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DBA NOVA POINTE APARTMENTS \O SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 11 LLP KENYA BRINSON, and individual; KENYA ) CASE NO. CIV DS 201 7097 12 BRINSON 0n behalf of LENNOX M., a 2000 minor individual DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO Mansukhani, Sulte 92101 13 MOTIONS T0 PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES T0 ay, CA l4 FORM INTERROGATORIES — vs. GENERAL, SET ONE; Scully Broad“ Diego, 15 DECLARATION OF DAN QUON SOCAL PAClFIC MF MANAGEMENT vvvvvvvvvvvvvv Rees W San l6 CORP, a California Corporation, dba Nova 101 Pointe Apaxtments, and DOES 1 THROUGH Hon. John M. Tomberlin Gordon l7 50, inclusive Dept.: S33 Date: March 8, 2022 18 Defendants. Time: 9:00 a.m. 19 Complaint Filed: August 24, 2020 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Defendant SoCal Pacific MF Management C011). (“SoCal”) submits this opposition to the 22 plaintifl‘s’ two Motions to Compel Further Responses t0 Plaintifl‘s’ Form Interrogatories — 23 General, Set One, and Request for Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant and Its Counsel. 24 SoCal asks the Court t0 deny the plaintifi's’ motions and their requests for sanctions. This 25 opposition is supported by the attached Declaration of Dan Quon (“Quon Decl.”) and a Separate 26 4;» ,.5' Statement. , rfi'Kfi 27 6-st ‘ /// 28 ‘ ("Li -1- fimeAfiTEBfiESfifi FoT’fAfifilFFsK/IETTONS To COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES T0 FORM "‘1’ INTERROGATORIES — GENERAL, SET ONE; DECLARATION OF DAN QUON Ea ;, _—_————————_——— A t