On November 03, 2021 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Doe, John Vnr,
and
Brown, Eric Lynn,
Does 1-100,
Victor Valley Union High School District,
for Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
V ;
\r
CM-015
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
'—
CRISTINA J. NOLAN (CA State Bar N0. 318495)
MANLY, STEWART & FINALDI
19100 Von Karman, Suite 800 F I LE D
Irvine, CA 926 1 2 SléPOEHIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
UNTY OF SAN BERNARD'NO
TELEPHONE N0; 949-252—9990 FAX No. (Optional): 949-252-9991
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): cnolan@manlystewart.com
ATTORNEY FOR(Name): Plaintiff;
APR 1 9 2023
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
‘
STREET ADDRESS: 247 West Third Street
MAILING ADDRESS: 247 West Third Street
BY: Rina Phimps‘ DepU‘V
cm AND 2w cone: San Bernardino, CA 9241 5-02 1 0
BRANCH NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: John VFA Doe, et a1.
CIVSB2218525
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Victor Valley Union High School District, et a1. JUDICIALOFFICER
Khymberli S. Apaloo
DEPT.:
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE $25
Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above.
1. a. Title: JOHN VNR DOE v. VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et a1.
b. Case number: CIVSBZ 1 3 141 8
c. Court: same as above
Department:
E other state or federal court (name
S14
and address): 1“
e
d.
. Case type: E limited civil unlimited civil E probate E family law E other (specify):
f. Filing date: November 3, 2021
g.
h.
Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?"
Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check
E
all
Yes
that apply):
No
involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims.
arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of
the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.
E involves claims against,
is
title to, possession of, or damages
likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources
to the same property.
if heard by different judges.
D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h
i. Status of case:
pending
E
E
dismissed
disposed of by judgment
E with E withoutprejudice
2. a. Title: JOHN VBK DOE V. VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et a1.
b. Case number: CIVSB2200478
c. Court: same as above
d. Department
E other state or federal court
S32
(name and address):
Pago 1 of 3
Form Approved for Optional Use Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300
Judicial Council of California
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE www.courfinfo.ca.gov
CM-015 (Rev. July 1. 2007]
V h r
\J
CM-015
_ PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: John VFA Doe, et a1.
CASE NUMBER‘
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Victor Valley Union High School District, et a1.
CIVSB2218525
2. (continued)
e. Casetype: E limited civil unlimited civil
E probate E familylaw E other (specify):
f. Filing date: January 7, 2022
g.
h .
Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?"
Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check
E
all
Yes
that apply):
No
involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims.
arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of
the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.
E involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property.
is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources
.
E
Status of case:
Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h
if heard by different judges.
pending
E dismissed E with E: withoutprejudice
E disposed of by judgment
54° m - Title: JANE VGL DOE, et a1. V. VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et a1.
Case number: CIVSB221 83 80
Court: same as above
Department:
E S32
other state or federal court (name and address):
D E D
.
T“€D
. Casetype:
Filing date: August
limited civil
19, 2022
unlimited civil
E probate familylaw other (specify):
.3"?
Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?"
Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check
D
all
Yes
that apply):
No
involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims.
arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of
the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.
E involves claims against,
for other
title to, possession of, or damages
reasons to require substantial duplication ofjudicial resources
to the same property.
is likely heard by different judges.
E Additional explanation is attached in attachment 3h
if
Status of case:
pending
E
E
dismissed E
disposed of by judgment
with E without prejudice
4. Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4. Number of pages attached: 1
Date:
CRISTlNALNOLAN
April 18, 2023
CM-015IR°V-J“'y"2°°"
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME 0F PARTY OR ATTORNEV)
NOTICE 0F RELATED CASE
> W Q. flaw
(SIGNATuflflF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
Page 2 of 3
Document Filed Date
April 19, 2023
Case Filing Date
November 03, 2021
Category
Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
V ; \r CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY '— CRISTINA J. NOLAN (CA State Bar N0. 318495) MANLY, STEWART & FINALDI 19100 Von Karman, Suite 800 F I LE D Irvine, CA 926 1 2 SléPOEHIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA UNTY OF SAN BERNARD'NO TELEPHONE N0; 949-252—9990 FAX No. (Optional): 949-252-9991 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): cnolan@manlystewart.com ATTORNEY FOR(Name): Plaintiff; APR 1 9 2023 SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO ‘ STREET ADDRESS: 247 West Third Street MAILING ADDRESS: 247 West Third Street BY: Rina Phimps‘ DepU‘V cm AND 2w cone: San Bernardino, CA 9241 5-02 1 0 BRANCH NAME: CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: John VFA Doe, et a1. CIVSB2218525 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Victor Valley Union High School District, et a1. JUDICIALOFFICER Khymberli S. Apaloo DEPT.: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE $25 Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: JOHN VNR DOE v. VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et a1. b. Case number: CIVSBZ 1 3 141 8 c. Court: same as above Department: E other state or federal court (name S14 and address): 1“ e d. . Case type: E limited civil unlimited civil E probate E family law E other (specify): f. Filing date: November 3, 2021 g. h. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check E all Yes that apply): No involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. E involves claims against, is title to, possession of, or damages likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources to the same property. if heard by different judges. D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: pending E E dismissed disposed of by judgment E with E withoutprejudice 2. a. Title: JOHN VBK DOE V. VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et a1. b. Case number: CIVSB2200478 c. Court: same as above d. Department E other state or federal court S32 (name and address): Pago 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE www.courfinfo.ca.gov CM-015 (Rev. July 1. 2007] V h r \J CM-015 _ PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: John VFA Doe, et a1. CASE NUMBER‘ DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Victor Valley Union High School District, et a1. CIVSB2218525 2. (continued) e. Casetype: E limited civil unlimited civil E probate E familylaw E other (specify): f. Filing date: January 7, 2022 g. h . Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check E all Yes that apply): No involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. E involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources . E Status of case: Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h if heard by different judges. pending E dismissed E with E: withoutprejudice E disposed of by judgment 54° m - Title: JANE VGL DOE, et a1. V. VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et a1. Case number: CIVSB221 83 80 Court: same as above Department: E S32 other state or federal court (name and address): D E D . T“€D . Casetype: Filing date: August limited civil 19, 2022 unlimited civil E probate familylaw other (specify): .3"? Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check D all Yes that apply): No involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. E involves claims against, for other title to, possession of, or damages reasons to require substantial duplication ofjudicial resources to the same property. is likely heard by different judges. E Additional explanation is attached in attachment 3h if Status of case: pending E E dismissed E disposed of by judgment with E without prejudice 4. Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4. Number of pages attached: 1 Date: CRISTlNALNOLAN April 18, 2023 CM-015IR°V-J“'y"2°°" (TYPE OR PRINT NAME 0F PARTY OR ATTORNEV) NOTICE 0F RELATED CASE > W Q. flaw (SIGNATuflflF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) Page 2 of 3