arrow left
arrow right
  • ***MF***Doe -v- Victor Valley Union High School District et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • ***MF***Doe -v- Victor Valley Union High School District et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • ***MF***Doe -v- Victor Valley Union High School District et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • ***MF***Doe -v- Victor Valley Union High School District et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

V : ‘ \J CM-01 5 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY L CRISTINA NOLAN (CA State Bar No. 318495) J. MANLY, STEWART & FINALDI 19100 Von Karman, Suite 800 F LED I Irvine, CA 926 1 2 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA TELepHONENo.= 949—252—9990 FAXNo.(o,,,,-onao.- 949—252—9991 COW" OFSAN BERNARDINO E.MAIL Aonasss (optional): cnolan@manlystewart.com ArroRNEY F0R(Name).- Plaintiffs APR 1 9 2023 SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO i ' STREET ADDRESS: 247 West Third Street MAILING ADDRESS: 247 West Third Street BY: Rina thiPS~ Deputv CITY AND ZIP CODE: San Bemardino, CA 924 1 5-02 1 0 BRANCH NAME: CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIQNER: Jane VGL Doe, et a1. CIVSB2218380 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Victor Valley Union High School District, et a1. JUDICIALOFHCER Wildred J. Schneider, Jr. DEPT.: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE S32 Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: JOHN VNR DOE v. VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. b. Case number: CIVSB213 141 8 c. Court: same as above M v “TN F%D H E Sl4 other state or federal court (name and address): <3 d. :"‘CD . Department: Case type: E limited civil unlimited civil E probate D family law E other (specify): Filing date: November 3, 2021 3CD . . Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all D Yes that apply): No involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. D involves claims against, is likely for other reasons titie to, possession of, or damages to to require substantial duplication of judicial the same property. resources if heard by different judges. D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: pending E dismissed E with E withoutprejudice E disposed of by judgment 2. a. Title: JOHN VBK DOE V. VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et a1. b. Case number: CIVSB2200478 c. Court: same as above d. Department: E S32 other state or federal court (name and address): Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Cal. Rules of Court. rule 3.300 Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE www.couninfo.ca.gov CM-015 (Rev. July 1. 2007] REC SUPERlOR CO EIVED COUNTY OF UR T OF CALIFO SAN BERNARDIRNIA NO APR 19 2023 Samantha Be cen a