On December 06, 2001 a Answer was filed involving a dispute between Jordan, Cheryl Lynn, Jordan, James, Thomas Dee Engineering Company, and 4520 Corp., Abblummus Global, Inc., A C And S,Inc., A.H. Voss Company, Albay Construction, Allis-Chalmers Corp. Product Liability Trust, American Honda Motor Co., Inc., American Standard, Inc., Asbestos Corp. Limited, Asbestos Corporation Ltd., Asbestos Defendants, Babcock Borsig Power Inc Ref To Db Riley Inc, Blue Diamond Corp., Borg Warner Inc., Borgwarner Inc. Fka Borg-Warner Automotive, Inc., Bragg Investment Company, Inc., Bridgestone Firestone Americas Holdings, Inc., Bridgestone Firestone,Inc., Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, Llc,, Bwd Automotive, Calaveras Cement Co., Certainteed Corporation, Chevron Products Company, Colonial Sugar Refining Company, Conocophillips Company, Consolidated Insulation, Inc., Crane Co., Crown Cork & Seal Company,Inc., Daimlerchrysler Corporation, Dana Corporation, D. Cummins Corporation, Diamond International Corp., Dillingham Construction N.A.,Inc., Dixon Boiler Works Inc, Dixon Boiler Works, Inc., Does 1-800, Dow Chemical Company, Dresser Industries Inc., D.W. Nicholson Corporation, Eaton Corporation, Elliott Company, Elliott Turbomachinery Co., Inc., Fisher Controls International, Llc, Flintkote Co., Flintkote Mines Ltd., Flowserve Us Inc, Flowserve Us Inc., Fluor Corporation, Fmc Corporation -Turbo Pump Operation, Ford Motor Company, Foster Wheeler Llc, Garlock Sealing Technologies, Ll, Gatke Corporation, General Electric Company, General Motors Corporation, General Refractories Company, Genstar Co., Genuine Parts Company, Goodrich Corporation, Grinnell Corporation, Halliburton Company, Hanson Cement, Inc., Henry Vogt Machine Co., Hercules Powder Company, Honeywell International, Inc. Fka Alliedsignal, Imo Industries Inc.,, Imo Industries, Inc., J.R.Simplot Company, J.R. Simplot Company, A Nevada Corporation,, J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc., Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., Keenan Properties, Inc, Kubota Corporation, Lamons Gasket Company Dba Power Engineering &, Lear Siegler Diversified Holdings Corp., Maremont Corporation, Metalclad Insulation Corporation, Monsanto Company, Morton International, Inc. A Rohm And Haas Company, Oakfabco, Inc., Oscar E. Erickson, Inc., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc Dba Pacific, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Parsons Energy & Chemical Group, Inc., Parsons Energy & Chemicals Group Inc, Plant Insulation Company, Pnuemo Abex Corporation, As Successor, Power Engineering & Equipment Co. Inc., Quigley Company, Inc., Rapid-American Corporation, Republic Supply Company, Rheem Manufacturing Co, Rheem Manufacturing Company, Robertson-Ceco Corporation, Rosendahl Corporation, Santa Fe Braun, Inc. As Successor-In-Interest To, Sequoia Ventures, Inc., Shell Oil Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Standard Motor Products, Stuart Radiator Core Manufacturing Co Inc, Stuart Radiator Core Manufacturing Co. Inc., Stuart-Western, Inc., Sugar City Building Materials Inc., Taylor Plumbing Supply Company, Dba Globe Plumbing, Taylor Plumbing Supply Inc., Temporary Plant Cleaners, Inc., The Budd Company, Thomas Dee Engineering Company, Thorpe Insulation Company, Tosco Corporation, Tosco Refining Company, Trimon, Inc., Union Carbide Corporation, Unocal Corporation, Viacom Inc., Successor By Merger To Cbs Corporatio, Vogt Valve Company, Waldron, Duffy, Inc., Westburne Supply, Inc., Yale Industrial Products, Inc., Zurn Industries, Inc., for ASBESTOS in the District Court of San Francisco County.
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
WOU San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Oct-17-2003 11:01 am Case Number: CGC-01-402113 Filing Date: Oct-15-2003 11:00 Juke Box: 001 Image: 00812359 ANSWER JAMES JORDAN VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC) 001000812359 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned. JAY H. PICKING, ESQ. BAR NO. 92994 PRAY, PRICE, WILLIAMS & RUSSELL 555 East Ocean Blvd., Suite 810 I Long Beach, California 90802-5055 an. AS St Telephone (562) 436-1231 r Attorneys for Defendant, i3, Clert BRAGG INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. th oO #1 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 11 JAMES JORDAN, CASE NO: 402113 ue 12 Plaintiff, Eo EQ ANSWER OF DEFENDANT BRAGG 36 ao INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. TO 13 vs. 836 s¢ PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR a4 ge ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC) As PERSONAL INJURIES-ASBESTOS =EZ0 e 34 se du 36 15 c F and H; and DOES 1-800. Bezr O< woo alleged therein states facts sufficient to entitle Plaintiffs to an Sz 15 Suze u< 16 award of punitive damages against Defendant. ule UO< Qo 38. Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs have directed, ordered, Sz 15 Zezz pruc approved and/or ratified Defendant's conduct and Plaintiffs are Bow 16 U 53 sa Sunland Housing Group Inc. (1998) 18 Cal.4th 253. dugo 15 Buzz ru< 16 FORTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE EO Utoa BY 41. Defendant had no property interest, ownership or control az 17 <0 wo 18 of any premises at any time during which Plaintiffs allege exposure, injury or damages due to asbestos dust inhalation. 19 20 FORTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 42. Defendant refers to and incorporates herein each and 21 every affirmative defense pleaded by the other parties herein to 22 the extent that such defenses are not inconsistent with the matters 23 24 stated herein. FORTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 25 43. Defendant alleges that it presently has insufficient 26 knowledge or information on which to form a belief as to whether it 27 may have additional, as yet unasserted defenses available. 28 11 DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT Defendant reserves herein the right to assert additional defenses in the event discovery indicates that they would be appropriate. WHEREFORE, BRAGG prays for judgment as follows: 1 That Plaintiffs take nothing by reason of the Complaint on file herein; 2 That the court enter judgment in favor of BRAGG; 3 For recovery of Defendant’s costs of suit; 10 3 For appropriate credits and set-offs arising out of any 11 payment of Worker’s Compensation benefits, or otherwise, as alleged ua 12 above; and E83 13 4 For such other and further relief as this court may deem S3z0gs wi8Z =EEzON ae 14 just and proper. << ae a538 aa 3¢ go 15 Zaezr Fu¢’ Eow 16 PRAY, PRICE, WILLIAMS & RUSSELL O%ga bo az 17 $90 wo 18 Dated: so Jos By: