arrow left
arrow right
  • MARC NELSON VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARC NELSON VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

@ ORIGINAL Scott M. Erskine (SBN 257466) erskine@erskinelawgroup.com Los Angeles Superior Court Jonathan M. Shugart (SBN 278221) jshugart@erskinelawgroup.com ERSKINE LAW GROUP 342 South Main Street JUL 11 2016 Rochester, MI 48307 . Telephone: (248)601-4499 Sher R, at, EKUGUE estGlerk Facsimile: (248)601-4997 By. Deputy Attorney for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 1 CASE NO.: BC585093 12 MARC NELSON, Assigned to: Hon. Gregory Keosian 13 Plaintiff(s), Department: 61 oO MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 8 < 14 vs. nN x 15 FORD MOTOR COMPANY; a Delaware DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 8 corporation and DOES | through 10, TO EXCLUDE GOLDEN RULE ARGUMENT; 16 inclusive [PROPOSED] ORDER 17 Defendants. File Date: June 15, 2015 18 Trial Date: August 2, 2016 19 20 21 TO PLAINTIFF AND TO HIS ATTORNEY OF RECORD: 22 23 Ford Motor Company ("Ford") hereby moves the Court in limine for an Order excluding 24 a Golden Rule argument. 25 It is well settled that appeals to the sympathies of the jurors by asking that they try to 2126 imagine themselves in the position of the Plaintiff or "in Plaintiff's shoes" are clearly improper. m2 See Cassim v. Allstate Ins. Co., 33 Cal.4th 780, 796 (2004). This so-called "golden rule" ret 28 a oT 1 DEFENDANT'S MOTON IN LIMINE NO. 8