On September 25, 2013 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Nelson Marc,
and
Ford Motor Company,
for Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
t~
@ ORIGINAL
Scott M. Erskine, Bar (SBN 257466)
erskine@erskinelawgroup.com FILED
Superior Court of California
Jonathan M. Shugart (SBN 278221) ‘ounty of Los Angeles
jshugart@erskinelawgroup.com
THE ERSKINE LAW GROUP JUL 14 2016
342 South Main Street
Sherri A Carter, Exqcutive Otficer/Clerk
Rochester, MI 48307
By.mead Reet
Telephone: (248) 601-4499 Raul Sanchez
Deputy
Facsimile: (248) 601-4497
Attorneys for Defendant
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
10
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
11
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
12
13 oO
14
MARC NELSON, CASE NO.: BC585093 ~<
Plaintiffs,
15 DEFENDANT’S LIMITED OPPOSITION TO
vs. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE
16 NUMBER 6 TO PRECLUDE NON-EXPERTS
FORD MOTOR COMPANY; a Delaware DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY TESTIFYING
17 corporation and DOES | through 10, AS TO EXPERT MATTERS
inclusive
18 File Date: June 15, 2015
Defendants Trial Date:
19
20
21
22
With his Motion in Limine No. 6, Plaintiff Marc Nelson seeks to exclude any evidence in
23
the form of an expert opinion by a witness who has not been designated.
24
, Defendant Ford Motor Company opposes this motion on a limited basis because it
25
misstates the law with respect to experts who have been retained for the sole purpose of impeaching.
=ad 26
the testimony of another party’s expert witness. Under CCP 2034.310(b), these experts need not
+s 27
fe be designated. (“A party may call as a witness at trial an expert not previously designated by that
a
na 28
a
ee
@
1
DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY'S LIMITED
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 6
Document Filed Date
July 14, 2016
Case Filing Date
September 25, 2013
Category
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 08/10/2016
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
t~ @ ORIGINAL Scott M. Erskine, Bar (SBN 257466) erskine@erskinelawgroup.com FILED Superior Court of California Jonathan M. Shugart (SBN 278221) ‘ounty of Los Angeles jshugart@erskinelawgroup.com THE ERSKINE LAW GROUP JUL 14 2016 342 South Main Street Sherri A Carter, Exqcutive Otficer/Clerk Rochester, MI 48307 By.mead Reet Telephone: (248) 601-4499 Raul Sanchez Deputy Facsimile: (248) 601-4497 Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 12 13 oO 14 MARC NELSON, CASE NO.: BC585093 ~< Plaintiffs, 15 DEFENDANT’S LIMITED OPPOSITION TO vs. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE 16 NUMBER 6 TO PRECLUDE NON-EXPERTS FORD MOTOR COMPANY; a Delaware DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY TESTIFYING 17 corporation and DOES | through 10, AS TO EXPERT MATTERS inclusive 18 File Date: June 15, 2015 Defendants Trial Date: 19 20 21 22 With his Motion in Limine No. 6, Plaintiff Marc Nelson seeks to exclude any evidence in 23 the form of an expert opinion by a witness who has not been designated. 24 , Defendant Ford Motor Company opposes this motion on a limited basis because it 25 misstates the law with respect to experts who have been retained for the sole purpose of impeaching. =ad 26 the testimony of another party’s expert witness. Under CCP 2034.310(b), these experts need not +s 27 fe be designated. (“A party may call as a witness at trial an expert not previously designated by that a na 28 a ee @ 1 DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY'S LIMITED OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 6