On September 25, 2013 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Nelson Marc,
and
Ford Motor Company,
for Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Be
ORIGINAL
Scott M. Erskine, Bar (SBN 257466)
erskine@erskinelawgroup.com
Jonathan M. Shugart (SBN 278221) FILED
Superior Court of California
jshugart@erskinelawgroup.com ‘Ounty of Los Angeles
THE ERSKINE LAW GROUP
342 South Main Street JUL 14 2016
Rochester, MI 48307
at mere
Sh ‘erri A Carter,Exgcutive Officer/Clerk
Telephone: (248) 601-4499 By.
Facsimile: (248) 601-4497 Raul Sanchez
Oeputy
Attorneys for Defendant
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
11
12 MARC NELSON, CASE NO.: BC585093
13 Plaintiffs,
DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S
14 VS. LIMITED OPPOSITION PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 4 TO PROHIBIT
15 FORD MOTOR COMPANY; a Delaware REFERENCE TO DISCLAIMER OF
corporation and DOES | through 10, IMPLIED WARRANTY
16 inclusive
File Date: June 15, 2015
17 Defendants Trial Date:
18
19
20
21 With his Motion in Limine No. 4, Plaintiff Marc Nelson seeks to exclude testimony or
22 evidence regarding any claim of a disclaimer of the implied warranty.
23 Defendant Ford Motor Company does not intend to introduce testimony or evidence
24 regarding disclaimer of the implied warranty. Defendant only opposes this motion to the extent
25 that the Motion implies that any evidence pertaining to the implied warranty of merchantability is
6 admissible.
oa
-27 Accordingly, while Defendant does not oppose Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 4, it
Be
28 contends that the Motion is entirely moot since Plaintiff should not be permitted to introduce any
aa
ee
a
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
Document Filed Date
July 14, 2016
Case Filing Date
September 25, 2013
Category
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 08/10/2016
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Be ORIGINAL Scott M. Erskine, Bar (SBN 257466) erskine@erskinelawgroup.com Jonathan M. Shugart (SBN 278221) FILED Superior Court of California jshugart@erskinelawgroup.com ‘Ounty of Los Angeles THE ERSKINE LAW GROUP 342 South Main Street JUL 14 2016 Rochester, MI 48307 at mere Sh ‘erri A Carter,Exgcutive Officer/Clerk Telephone: (248) 601-4499 By. Facsimile: (248) 601-4497 Raul Sanchez Oeputy Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 11 12 MARC NELSON, CASE NO.: BC585093 13 Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S 14 VS. LIMITED OPPOSITION PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 4 TO PROHIBIT 15 FORD MOTOR COMPANY; a Delaware REFERENCE TO DISCLAIMER OF corporation and DOES | through 10, IMPLIED WARRANTY 16 inclusive File Date: June 15, 2015 17 Defendants Trial Date: 18 19 20 21 With his Motion in Limine No. 4, Plaintiff Marc Nelson seeks to exclude testimony or 22 evidence regarding any claim of a disclaimer of the implied warranty. 23 Defendant Ford Motor Company does not intend to introduce testimony or evidence 24 regarding disclaimer of the implied warranty. Defendant only opposes this motion to the extent 25 that the Motion implies that any evidence pertaining to the implied warranty of merchantability is 6 admissible. oa -27 Accordingly, while Defendant does not oppose Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 4, it Be 28 contends that the Motion is entirely moot since Plaintiff should not be permitted to introduce any aa ee a 1 PROOF OF SERVICE