arrow left
arrow right
  • City of Ontario -v- Mondragon et al Print Other Real Property Unlimited  document preview
  • City of Ontario -v- Mondragon et al Print Other Real Property Unlimited  document preview
  • City of Ontario -v- Mondragon et al Print Other Real Property Unlimited  document preview
  • City of Ontario -v- Mondragon et al Print Other Real Property Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

V \r CHARISSE L. SMITH, Bar N0. 213646 EXEMPT FROM FILING FEES PURSUANT TO VENUS G. TRUNNEL, Bar No. 179980 GOV. CODE § 6103 THE LAW OFFICES OF CHARISSE L. SMITH 8301 Utica Avenue, Suite 102 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 SUP F Telephone. (909) 257- 0650 Cam?” Cr! LTE‘ 5 Facsimile: (909) 257- 0649 SQA'BIZTROVZ “W ‘ n‘aéFOR I DIM)“W3 0pm . csmith@clsmithlaw.com . JUI/v 0 l 4’»; ’t fl" Vtrunnel@clsmithlaw.com 2U2’] 8y" f... Attorneys for Plaintiff, City of Ontario “2% x» MIEAF‘ROYC I PUW \OOOVQ SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 91730 10 SAN BERNARDINO JUSTICE CENTER 130 11 CITY OF ONTARIO, a California Case N0. CIVSB21 10899 SUITE CALIFORNIA municipal corporation, on behalf 0f the OF Judge: Hon. John M. Tomberlin SMITH 12 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OFFICES L. AVENUE, 13 CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Petitioner, [m1 ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CHARISSE 14 CUCAMONGA, LAW UTICA [Filed concurrently with: v. 15 Notice of Motion and Motion; 8301 CARLOS RONCES MONDRAGON, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, an RANCHO 16 individual; . Request for Judicial Notice; WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. . Declaration of David Bucholtz, 17 a national association; and DOES . WNQMAri Declaration of Miguel Jimenez; 1 through Declaration 0f Salvador Avina; 25, inclusive, 18 . Declaration 0f Charisse Smith, and Exhibit List of Declarations from Defendants and Respondents. 19 Neighboring Property Owners. ] 20 Hearing 0n Motion for Preliminary 21 Injunction: Date: June 24, 2021 22 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept: S33 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION \a \z ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Upon consideration of the written pleadings and oral arguments of the parties presented at the hearing on the Plaintiff‘s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction on , 2021, and good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Carlos Ronces Mondragon (“Owner”) and his respective agents, employees, successors, or assignees, and other related entities acting with the Owner and/or 0n his behalf, are hereby enjoined and prohib ited throughout the pendency of the above—captioned case, from maintaining the Property located at 2020 S. Magnolia Avenue, in the City 0f Ontario, California, Assessor’s Parcel Number 1014-541 - 10-0000 and 1014-5 14-10-1000 (the “Property”) in a 91730 manner which constitutes a public nuisance. 102 CALIFORNIA SUITE OF SMITH PROHIBITORY INJUNCTION - Specifically, the Owner is prohibited from the L. OFFICES AVENUE, following: 1) Having 0r allowing others to have public events, including but not limited to CHARISSE CUCAMONGA, weddings, corporate parties, and community parties, or invitin LAW UTICA g the public onto the Property for any reason; 2) Playing or allowing others to play live music or instruments outdoors 8301 at the Property RANCHO to the extent such music or instruments can be heard offsite; 3) Using 0r allowing others t0 use amplified sound such as microphones, speakers, or bullhorns at the Property; and 4) Conducting or allowing others t0 conduct business 0f any kind from or at the Property. MANDATORY INJUNCTION - Additionally, the Owner is ordered t0 take the following actions: Finalize all outstanding permits (B201 8021 53, B201 802386, and B201 802387, B201802388, B202004146, and 8202004283) or remove any unpermitted structures/construction within 150 days from the date of this Order. ORDER T0 SHOW CAUSE THE DEFENDANTS ARE FURTHER ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any they have, why a Receiver should not be appointed pursuant to Califo rnia Health and Safety Code -2- ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION