arrow left
arrow right
  • REYES GROUP, LTD.  vs.  ELK ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • REYES GROUP, LTD.  vs.  ELK ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • REYES GROUP, LTD.  vs.  ELK ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • REYES GROUP, LTD.  vs.  ELK ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • REYES GROUP, LTD.  vs.  ELK ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • REYES GROUP, LTD.  vs.  ELK ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • REYES GROUP, LTD.  vs.  ELK ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
  • REYES GROUP, LTD.  vs.  ELK ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.CNTR CNSMR COM DEBT document preview
						
                                

Preview

CAUSE NO. DC-21-17449 REYES GROUP, LTD, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT PLAINTIFF, § § VS. § 101ST DISTRICT COURT § ELK ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, § INC., § DEFENDANT. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER ON THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BK CORROSION. LLC'S MOTION IN LIMIN E The above and foregoing Motion was duly and timely presented to the Court and IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as to each individually numbered paragraph of said Motion as follows: Paragraph l. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 2. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 3. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 4. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 5. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 6. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 7. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 8. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 9. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 10. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 11. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 12. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph l3. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 14. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) ORDER ON THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BK CORROSION, LLC’S MOTION IN LIMINE PAGE 1 Paragraph 15. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph l6. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 17. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 18. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph l9. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 20. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 21 . SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 22. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 23. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 24. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 25. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 26. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 27. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 28. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 29. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 30. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 31. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 32. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 33. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 34. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 35. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 36. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 37. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 38. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) ORDER ON THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BK CORROSION, LLC’S MOTION IN LIMINE PAGE 2 Paragraph 39. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 40. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 41. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 42. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) Paragraph 43. SUSTAINED (OVERRULED) AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff and Plaintiff‘s counsel, and all of Plaintiff‘s witnesses be and they are hereby instructed not to mention, either directly or indirectly, in any manner whatsoever, the matters referred to in those numbered Paragraphs referred to immediately above as having been "SUSTAINED" Without first approaching the bench and obtaining a favorable ruling fiom the Court, outside the hearing and/or presence of the jury, in regard to any theory of admissibility of such matters; and finally IT IS THE FINDING of the Court that a violation of this Order by Plaintiff, Plaintiffs counsel or any of Plaintiff‘s witnesses would be likely to constitute undue harm to Third-Party Defendant’s case and to deprive Third-Party Defendant of a fair and impartial jury trial, and could lead to a mistrial or other sanction, as justice might require. SIGNED this day of , 2023. JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER ON THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BK CORROSION, LLC’S MOTION IN LIMINE PAGE 3 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Yvonne White on behalf of Shelly Jock Bar No. 794026 ywhite@travelers.com Envelope ID: 73239357 Status as of 3/2/2023 11:19 AM CST Associated Case Party: ELK ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Daniel PBuechler dbuechler@thompsoncoe.com 3/1/2023 2:13:01 PM SENT Angela DCaffey acaffey@thompsoncoe.com 3/1/2023 2:13:01 PM SENT Lindsey Robison Irobison@thompsoncoe.com 3/1/2023 2:13:01 PM SENT Susan Dyess sdyess@thompsoncoe.com 3/1/2023 2:13:01 PM SENT Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Cathy Schmitz cschmitz@thompsoncoe.com 3/1/2023 2:13:01 PM SENT 101st District Court 101court@dallascounty.org 3/1/2023 2:13:01 PM SENT Laura Deen ldeen@njh-Iaw.com 3/1/2023 2:13:01 PM SENT CURTIS HUBBARD chubbard@njh-law.com 3/1/2023 2:13:01 PM SENT Associated Case Party: BK Corrosion, LLC Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Shelly S.Jock sjock@travelers.com 3/1/2023 2:13:01 PM SENT Shelly S.Jock sjock@travelers.com 3/1/2023 2:13:01 PM SENT