Document for FRANCISCO GONZALES VS SAN GABRIEL TRANSIT INC ET AL

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/15/2022 09:18 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by L. Smith,Deputy Clerk




            1      Kevin V. DeSantis, Esq. (SBN 137963)
                   James A. McFaul, Esq. (SBN 248670)
            2      David D. Cardone, Esq. (SBN 254954)
                   DUNN DESANTIS
            3      WALT & KENDRICK, LLP
                   750 B Street, Suite 2620
            4      San Diego, California 92101
                   (619) 574-4488 / Facsimile (619) 255-4868
            5      KDeSantis@ddwklaw.com / JMcFaul@ddwklaw.com /
                   DCardone@ddwklaw.com
            6
                   Attorneys for Defendants SAN GABRIEL TRANSIT, INC.;
            7      SOUTHLAND TRANSIT, INC.; and ARCADIA TRANSIT, INC.
            8                                  SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
            9                                                FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
          10       FRANCISCO GONZALES, Individually,             )                                 CASE NO. BC536584
                   and on behalf of All Similarly Situated       )                                 Related Case: 20STCV29734
          11       Individuals                                   )
                                                                 )                                 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO
          12              Plaintiff,                             )                                 PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR
                                                                 )                                 CLASS CERTIFICATION
          13       vs.                                           )
                                                                 )                                 [Filed concurrently with Memorandum in
          14       SAN GABRIEL TRANSIT, INC., a California )                                       Opposition to Renewed Motion for Class
                   corporation; SOUTHLAND TRANSIT, INC. a )                                        Certification; Appendix of Evidence in
          15       California corporation; ARCADIA TRANSIT, )                                      Opposition to Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for
                   INC. dba BLACKCAR LA, a California            )                                 Class Certification; Proposed Order on
          16       corporation; and DOES 1 through 25, Inclusive )                                 Evidentiary Objections to Plaintiff’s Renewed
                                                                 )                                 Motion for Class Certification]
          17              Defendants.                            )
                                                                 )                                 Date:                        July 5, 2022
          18                                                     )                                 Time:                        10:00 a.m.
                   AND RELATED CASES.                            )                                 Dept:                        17
          19                                                     )                                 Judge:                       Hon. Maren E. Nelson
                                                                 )
          20                                                     )                                 Action Filed:                February 14, 2014
                                                                 )                                 Trial Date:                  Not set
          21

          22

          23                  Defendant San Gabriel Transit, Inc., (“SGT”) respectfully submits the following objections
          24       to evidence submitted by Plaintiff in support of his renewed motion for class certification and as
          25       referenced in Plaintiff’s opening memorandum of points and authorities (“O.B.”). The evidence
          26       Plaintiff submitted in support of his renewed motion for class certification is identical to the
          27       evidence Plaintiff submitted in support of his prior motion for class certification. All of the
          28       objections included herein were previously sustained by the Court in ruling on Plaintiff’s initial

                                                                                              1
                   EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION