arrow left
arrow right
  • AMBER DOMINGUEZ VS ALPHA SIGMA TAU NATIONAL SOROITY INC ET A Civil Rights/Discrimination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • AMBER DOMINGUEZ VS ALPHA SIGMA TAU NATIONAL SOROITY INC ET A Civil Rights/Discrimination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

@ @ LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP Buy PUL, lee STEPHEN K. HIURA, SB# 149968 eRBY Of Lar Ament E-Mail: Stephen.Hiura@lewisbrisbois.com 633 West 5" Street, Suite 4000 JUL 31 Lui Los Angeles, California 90071 Shersi R, Carter, Exec uHEve Officer/Clerk Telephone: 213.250.1800 By. it Facsimile: 213.250.7900 skne Gnjal Depaty Attorneys for Defendants, ALPHA SIGMA TAU SORORITY, INC. (erroneously sued as ALPHA SIGMA TAU NATIONAL SORORITY, INC.) and BRITNEY LYNCH SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 AMBER DOMINGUEZ, CASE NO. BC651569 12 Plaintiff, [The Hon. David Sotelo, Dept. 40] 13 VS. SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS ALPHA SIGMA TAU 14 ALPHA SIGMA TAU NATIONAL SORORITY, INC.’S AND BRITNEY SORORITY, INC.; BRITNEY LYNCH; LYNCH’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER 15 VIVIAN TRAN; SIMONE BENJAMIN; REQUIRING AN INDEPENDENT BRENDA SANCHEZ; and DOES 1| through MENTAL EXAMINATION OF 16 20, Inclusive, PLAINTIFF 17 Defendants. Date: August 29, 2018 Time: 8:30 a.m. 18 Dept.: 40 19 Reservation ID: 180724333851 20 Action Filed: February 23, 2017 FSC Date: September 13, 2018 21 Trial Date: September 25, 2018 22 23 24 Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1345(a)(6), defendants, ALPHA SIGMA TAU 25 SORORITY, INC. and BRITNEY LYNCH (“Defendants”), submit this separate statement in @ Op 26 support of motion for an order requiring an independent mental examination (“IME”) of plaintiff, @ mo 27 AMBER DOMINGUEZ (“Plaintiff”). & 28 ~ LEWIS BRISBOIS 4847-5797-2333.1 1 BISGAARD SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING AN & SMMHUP INDEPENDENT MENTAL EXAMINATION ATTORNEYS ATW