On August 09, 2014 a
Motion in Limine - MOTION IN LIMINE 5
was filed
involving a dispute between
Schmittle Juanita Denise,
and
Baldwin Park Unified School District,
Cazorla Sergio,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/30/2019 11:38 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk
1 LAW OFFICES OF JOE HARITON, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
JOE HARITON, SBN 133994
2 E-MAIL: JOE@HARITONLAW.COM
3 Physical Address: 10215 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite C, Century City, CA 90067
Mailing Address: 10573 W. Pico Blvd., #201, Los Angeles, CA 90064
4 Telephone: 310.218.0535
Facsimile: 310.218.0536
5
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff, JUANITA DENISE SCHMITTLE
7 SUPERIOR COURT IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
8
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE
9
10 JUANITA DENISE SCHMITTLE CASE NO. BC 595422
[Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Judge
11 Plaintiff, Teresa A. Beaudet, Dept. 50]
12
vs. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE
13 NO. 5 - TO EXCLUDE ANY AND ALL
BALDWIN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL EVIDENCE RELATED TO
14 DISTRICT; and DOES 1 through 10, MATTER NOT SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE
15 inclusive,
16 Defendants. Complaint Filed: September 22, 2015
17 Trial Date: September 4, 2019
18
19 TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS
20 OF RECORD:
21 As counsel for Plaintiff has properly attempted to meet and confer regarding the subject
22 of this Motion in Limine No. 5 (“MIL #5) - To Exclude any and all Evidence Related to Matter
23 Not Subject to Disclosure regarding Plaintiff, and no resolution was attained without the Court’s
24 ruling, Plaintiff Juanita Denise Schmittle hereby moves the Court to exclude any and all
25 evidence at trial related to matter not subject to Disclosure regarding Plaintiff.
26 The matter in question concerns that which is contained in section 1) referenced in
27 Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine meet and confer letter provided to Defendant which is subject to
28 privacy, confidentiality and may not be disclosed. The court will be provided with the specifics
-1-
PLAINTIFF’S MIL #5
Document Filed Date
July 30, 2019
Case Filing Date
August 09, 2014
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/30/2019 11:38 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk 1 LAW OFFICES OF JOE HARITON, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION JOE HARITON, SBN 133994 2 E-MAIL: JOE@HARITONLAW.COM 3 Physical Address: 10215 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite C, Century City, CA 90067 Mailing Address: 10573 W. Pico Blvd., #201, Los Angeles, CA 90064 4 Telephone: 310.218.0535 Facsimile: 310.218.0536 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff, JUANITA DENISE SCHMITTLE 7 SUPERIOR COURT IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE 9 10 JUANITA DENISE SCHMITTLE CASE NO. BC 595422 [Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Judge 11 Plaintiff, Teresa A. Beaudet, Dept. 50] 12 vs. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE 13 NO. 5 - TO EXCLUDE ANY AND ALL BALDWIN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL EVIDENCE RELATED TO 14 DISTRICT; and DOES 1 through 10, MATTER NOT SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE 15 inclusive, 16 Defendants. Complaint Filed: September 22, 2015 17 Trial Date: September 4, 2019 18 19 TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS 20 OF RECORD: 21 As counsel for Plaintiff has properly attempted to meet and confer regarding the subject 22 of this Motion in Limine No. 5 (“MIL #5) - To Exclude any and all Evidence Related to Matter 23 Not Subject to Disclosure regarding Plaintiff, and no resolution was attained without the Court’s 24 ruling, Plaintiff Juanita Denise Schmittle hereby moves the Court to exclude any and all 25 evidence at trial related to matter not subject to Disclosure regarding Plaintiff. 26 The matter in question concerns that which is contained in section 1) referenced in 27 Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine meet and confer letter provided to Defendant which is subject to 28 privacy, confidentiality and may not be disclosed. The court will be provided with the specifics -1- PLAINTIFF’S MIL #5