arrow left
arrow right
  • JUANITA DENISE SCHMITTLE VS BALDWIN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JUANITA DENISE SCHMITTLE VS BALDWIN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED Sy rior Court of California ounty of Los Angeles Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles a By. MAY 1.1 2018 fermi Te} ace onafierk Department 50 JUANITA DENISE SCHMITTLE, Case No.: BC 595422 Plaintiff, Hearing Date: May 11, 2018 vs. Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m. 10 BALDWIN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL fFENTATEVE} ORDER RE: DISTRICT, et al., 11 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE A FIRST Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT 12 13 14 Background Plaintiff Juanita Denise Schmittle (“Schmittle”) filed this employment action against her 15 16 employer Defendant Baldwin Park Unified School District (“BPUSD”). Schmittle’s Complaint 17 alleges causes of action for discrimination, retaliation, failure to accommodate, failure to engage in good faith interactive process, and failure to prevent discrimination. 18 19 During the pendency of the instant case, Schmittle was charged by the Los Angeles 20 County District Attorney with worker’s compensation insurance fraud. The charges stem from a 21 report of suspected worker’s compensation insurance fraud on the part of Schmittle filed by Sergio Cazorla (“Cazorla”), Director of Risk Management & Benefits for the BPUSD, in or around December 2015. The charges against Schmittle have now been dismissed. 23, Schmittle now moves to amend the Complaint to include facts and causes of action related to her allegedly wrongful arrest and prosecution and the alleged failure to accommodate & Schmittle. BPUSD opposes. 26 27 28