arrow left
arrow right
  • ORANGE AERO LTD VS AVFI-1 LLC Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ORANGE AERO LTD VS AVFI-1 LLC Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

@ Stephen G. Zimmerman SBN 235698 2914 E Katella Ave. Suite 200 FILED Orange, CA 92867 Superior Court of California ounty of Los Angeles Tel. (714) 758-5301 Fax (714) 464-2280 SEP 23 2016 Counsel for defendants: f ve Otic Clark Sherr A Carter, Exqcuti AVFI-1, AAC, CAM, and Craig Garrick _-| Deputy Raui Sanchoz SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (Unlimited) 10 Orange Aero, Ltd; Case No.: BC575195 i Hon. William Fahey Presiding Plaintiff, 12 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION JN LIMINE NO. 2 vs. TO EXCLUDE PAROL EVIDENCE 13 AVFI-1, LLC and DOES 1-20, inclusive. FSC: October 19, 2016 14 Time: 9:30 a.m. 15 Defendants. Dept. 69 16 Trial Date: October 31, 201 Y FAX 17 18 19 Defendants AVFI-1, LLC, AAC, LLC, CAM, LLC and Craig Garrick respectfully move 20 in limine pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 1856 and Civil Code § 1625 and Evid. Code 21 §§210, 350 and 352 for an order excluding parol evidence. Defendants intend to introduce the 22 Engine Purchase Agreement, dated March 20, 2013 and the Amendment to Engine Purchase 23 Agreement, dated April 25, 2013. A true and correct copy of Exhibit A to the Complaint, The 24 Engine Purchase Agreement and Amendment are attached hereto as Exhibit A. Defendants Lo 25 believe that plaintiff will attempt to introduce extrinsic evidence and expert testimony to show mo 26 what the contracting parties intended drafting the Agreement and Amendment, notwithstanding 27 the plain meaning of each contract. The Court should preclude the introduction of this improper 28 parol evidence. -l- Defendants’ Motion Jn Limine No. 2 to Exclude Parol Evidence