Party Discovery: MICHAEL R CARVER VS HOVIK MEGUERIAN ET AL

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                I          IiLIGENI?, S. FU. Esq. (SBN 290889)
 ,          825 S. Ynez Avenue                                                                                                     H mia
 "                             ,                                                                              ‘                    l 0
            Los Angeles. California 91 754                                                             Su(_E,g{i?iIyCc)ofuLnogtAn;aelee
 3          PI         A»: (2( 552-1950
 4
                    ‘°“f‘,’.i’,  .      S.        .        .
            /I!(()Il1L‘_I_/OI I Iamllj/, .'I'”C]I/‘IILL R. (Alt! 12R
                                                                                                              qFP112[ll7
                                                                                                              '~ -—
                                                                                                                    Execgg/3.,Otticer/Clerk
                                                                                                   Sherri R Carter.
 5                                                                                                     By                            Deputy
                                                                                                                  Kent 8. Tobe‘!

 O


 7                                                 SUPISRIOR COURT OI’ C/\I..II’ORi\‘IA

 8                                    COUNTY OI’ LOS ANGELES — I\'ORTII\\»"I{S'I‘ DISTRICT
 9

‘“          MIC]-lAI?.I, R. CARVER.                                    ) Case No. BC 526009
                                                                       )
”                                        Plaintiff.                    ) I’LAINTII7I<“'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. I
,3          V                                                          5 TO IZXCI,UI)E IiXI’ERT WITNESS
                .                                                      ) TESTIMONY OI?‘ GRAHAM \\"O()LI~‘. MD.
                                                                               V      I   ‘V

                                                                       J ICCI’ §2(b4..~<><)];
 1                                                                                             N
"           no\/u< & I.UCINI3 =.\~II3GUI‘3RIAN. et al..
14                                                                     I DECLARATION OI’ EUGENE S. FU. ESQ.
    _                                   I)eIb1itI211its.               )
D                                                                      3      Trial Date: September 11. 2017
to                                                                     )      Dept.       U
 _
I I                      —-
                                                                       )

IS                                                A
            TO ALI. I’./\RTII£S AND TIIIZIR ATTORNEYS 0]’ RECORD:
to
                        I’laintiI”f. MICHAEI. R. CARVER ("I’Iztinti“), hereby moves the Court for an Order in
30
            I.i1nine excluding testitnony from Grzihzun M. Woolf‘. M.D.. the proposed expert witness of
21
            Defendant Lueine Meguerizm ("Defendz1nt”).
22
                        This motion is made on the following grounds:
23
                        (I) Code Civ. I’_rg_e_. §2034.30O precludes expert witness testimony from Graham Woolf, M.D.
24
            because DeI'endant failed to designate him or any other expert witness pursuant to her own Demand
25
            for I..i.\’change of Expert Witness Information. served in September. 2016;
26
                        (2) Expert exchange must be "mutual" and “simuItancous", and Defendant may not designate
3.
 1          her expert five months after the I’l'.tir1tiI'1’s timely expert disclosure:
28
                                                                           I’:tge I                                      I

                                   PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. ’I TO EXCLUDE EXPERT
                                        WITNESS TESTIMONY OF GRAHAM WOOLF, M.D.
        I                                                                                                                                 .