arrow left
arrow right
  • MICHAEL R CARVER VS HOVIK MEGUERIAN ET AL Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MICHAEL R CARVER VS HOVIK MEGUERIAN ET AL Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

‘ Fu F ' 5§£’3{y‘§‘},‘$’§rL3a/ /.08Ang/7/q MICHAEL CARVER V. LUCINE MEGUERIAN ET AL. JUL 0 9 2020 . ‘ "iefr/,1‘-. C RULING ON MOTION TO TAX COSTS 8y mc nloasra er/C-,8, . Date of Hearing: July 8, 2020 Trial Date: Post—tria1 W0 ‘Deputy *0 Department: W Case No. BC5 66645 Moving Party: Defendants Balboa Luxury Condominiums, Van Alden, Inc. and Hovik Meguerian Responding Party: Untimely opposition led on July 6, but considered by court. ' I. Background Plaintiff Michael Carver led the instant action on December 12, 2014 against Lucine Meguerian, her brother, Hovik Meguerian (also known as John), Vanalden, Inc. and Balboa Luxury Condominiums, Inc. The rst amended complaint was led on April 25, 2015 and asserted twelve causes of action based on a shooting which occurred on December 15, 2012. On that date, Lucine and John Meguerian’s father, Hrant Meguerian, obtained a gun and, after a brief argument in the home where all had gathered for a meal, shot Lucine’s mother, Ana Meguerian, and her close companion, Michael Carver. Ana Meguerian died as a result of the shooting, and plaintiff was seriously injured. Hrant was subsequently convicted of the shootings. In this lawsuit, Michael Carver sought to establish the liability of John Meguerian and two companies he controlled, Balboa Luxury Condominiums, Inc. and Vanalden, Inc., for his injuries on theories that they were landlords of the property where the shooting took place and failed to exercise reasonable care to prevent the shooting. He also sought damages for alleged conversion of his personal property, both before and after the shooting, and for denying him access to the house after the shooting. The latter claim was premised on Civil Code Section 789.3, which provides that a “landlord shall not, with intent to terminate the occupancy under any lease or other tenancy or estate at will, however created, of property used by a tenant as his residence, willfully (I) prevent the tenant from gaining reasonable access to the property by changing the locks. . . .” I The court bifurcated the issues of liability and damages. After an eight day trial on the liability phase the jury returned a verdict as follows: Vanalden, Inc., (but not John or Lucine Meguerian,) was found liable for negligence; John Meguerian and Vanalden, Inc. were found liable for trespass, Vanalden, Inc. and Balboa Luxury Condominium were found liable for conversion, and Vanalden, Inc. was found to have prevented plaintiffs access to the property, in violation of Civil Code Section 789.3. The jury also found that plaintiff had established that John Meguerian and Vanalden, Inc. and Balboa Luxury Condominiums had engaged in conduct with malice, fraud or oppression. Plaintiff did not establish any claims against Lucine Meguerian. After the second phase of the trial, at which evidence was presented of plaintiffs damages and the defendants’ nancial worth for purposes of punitive damages, the jury returned a special verdict on August 19, 2019 in plaintiffs favor as follows. On the negligence claim, the V g:: : ;: jury found plaintiff to have been 70% at fault; the jury awarded $520,000 in past economic loss; :3-_! $700,000 in future economic damages, and $800,000 in past and future noneconomic loss. The ~