arrow left
arrow right
  • MICHAEL R CARVER VS HOVIK MEGUERIAN ET AL Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MICHAEL R CARVER VS HOVIK MEGUERIAN ET AL Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/12/2021 03:59 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Inloes,Deputy Clerk LISA F. ROSENTHAL (BAR #153320) 1 ||LAW OFFICES OF ROSENTHAL & ASSOCIATES 6016 Fallbrook Ave. Suite 101 2 ||Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: (818) 348-2896 > || Facsimile: (8180348-1247 4 Attorneys for Defendants 5 Vanalden Inc., 6 ; SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 7 MICHAEL CARVER ) CASE NO.: BC 526009 10 toys ) Plaintiff ) Defendant's Opposition to il Plaintiff’s Motion for 12 || vs. ) Attorney Fees | ) 4 13 |) LUCINE MEGUERIAN; HOVIK JOHN ) | MEGUERIAN ) Date: February 16, 2021 14 fend ) Time: 8:30 Defendants ) Dept: W 15 a) 16 | | 17 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 16, 2021 at 8:30 a.m., o | 18 |ias soon thereafter as the matter can be heard in Department “W" o | 9 , : the above-entitled court, located at 6230 Sylmar Ave. Van Nuys, 20 Ca, Defendant Vanalden Inc., hereby opposed the motion for attorne 21 39 fees filed by Plaintiff. 23 This opposition is based upon the following: 24 1. This motion is untimely. The judgment in this case wa °° originally entered by this Court on October 4, 2019, Ex. A, an 26 then was amended to correct the amount awarded on April 30, 2020. 27 38 Ex. B. A motion for attorney fees is governed by California Rule Opposition to Motion for Attorney Fees