arrow left
arrow right
  • SANTOS MACIAS VS CRISTIAN OROZCO ET AL Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SANTOS MACIAS VS CRISTIAN OROZCO ET AL Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

. ®@ @ FILED LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY J. LUCETT Superior Court of California 330 North Brand Blvd., Suite 900 County of Los Angeles Glendale, CA 91203 Telephone: (818) 548-6316 MAY 30 2017 By: SHAGHIG I. DADAIAN Sherri R. Carter, Exec tt Addo. State Bar No. 130323 Officer/Clerk By. : » Deputy Our File No. 0361351562.1- Moses Soto Attorneys for Defendant(s): CHRISTIAN OROZCO, erroneously sued & served as CRISTIAN OROZCO and ALEJANDRINA OROZCO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 1] SANTOS MACIAS, AN CASE NO. BC604146 INDIVIDUAL, 12 DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO Plaintifi(s), PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE 13 NUMBER 2-EXCLUDE EVIDENCE vs. THAT PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY 14 RECOMMENDED AND/OR REFERRED CRISTIAN OROZCO, AN PLAINTIFF TO ANY DOCTORS FOR 15 INDIVIDUAL, AND ALEJANDRINA TREATMENT AND EXAM; OROZCO, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND 16 DOES 1 TO 100, INCLUSIVE, AUTHORITIES 17 Defendant(s). Judge: Howard Halm Dept.: 93 18 19 20 Defendants Cristian Orozco and Alejandrina Orozoco, hereby submit the following 21 Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Number 2-Exclude Evidence That Plaintiff's 22 Attomey Recommended and/or Referred Plaintiff to Any Doctors for Treatment and Exam as 23 follows: aa Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Number 2-Exclude Evidence That Plaintiffs Attorney 25: Recommended and/or Referred Plaintiff to Any Doctors for Treatment and Exam should be 25; denied as the Defendants contend that the Plaintiff did not seek medical treatments from his 27! regular treating physicians and instead sought excessive chiropractic care from his attorney 28 referred physicians for his alleged injuries. This Opposition is based upon this Notice, on the 1