On October 15, 2015 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Mayo Sociedad Mutualista Cinco De,
and
Acevedo Rosa Margarita,
Avila Jaime Romo,
Enriquez Carlos,
Hernandez America,
Hernandez Patricia,
Ramos Maria Guadalupe,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Y
XA
@
ALAN G. NOVODOR, ESQ. (S.B. #49681)
LAW OFFICES OF ALAN G. NOVODOR
11835 W. Olympic Boulevard, Suite 1125 E
Los Angeles, California 90064-5001 FILED
Telephone: (310) 479-9387 Sup erior Court of California
ounty of Los Angeles
Facsimile: (310) 479-9388
JAN 26 2017
Attorneys for Defendants Shi arti Carter, Exqgulive Olfiser/Gler
k
By.Rel Ne Gepuy
Raul Sanchez
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
on 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT, STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE
ay
Oa
Sas
S28 11 SOCIEDAD MUTUALISTA “CINCO DE ) CASE NO. BC 597 949
ZSg5
ALAS MAYO”, ) Complaint filed: October 15, 2015
OskaS 12 ) Assigned to: Honorable Howard L. Halm
ee
ZAggrs
eS Plaintiff, Judge, Dept 53
<3
43
35
ae 13 vs.
Bee ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE
nes 14 ROSA MARGARITA ACEVEDO, JAIME ) NO. 1 TO EXCLUDE DOCUMENTS,
Os SUSe
weg ROMO AVILA, CARLOS ENRIQUEZ, ) TESTIMONY AND OTHER EVIDENCE
SOfD Ss
ae 15 AMERICA HERNANDEZ, PATRICIA ) REQUESTED BUT NOT DISCLOSED
se
on HERNANDEZ, and MARIA GUADALUPE ) DURING DISCOVERY
tn 16 RAMOS,
) (Declaration of Alan G. Novodor re
17 Defendants. ) Compliance with Local Rule 8.92 is filed
) concurrently herewith]
18
) Final Status Conference:
19 ) Date: February 3, 2017
Time: 8:30 a.m.
20 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION ) Dept:: 53
21 ) Trial Date: February 15, 2017
22 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
23 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 3, 2017, at 8:30 a.m., in Department 53 of the
24 Superior Court of the State of California, for the County of Los Angeles, Central District, located at
25 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, California, Defendants Rosa Margarita Acevedo, Jaime Romo
26 Avila, Carlos Enriquez, America Hernandez, Patricia Hernandez, and Maria Guadalupe Ramos
27 (collectively, hereinafter, “Defendants”) will move in limine for an order preventing Plaintiff, its
counsel and all witnesses from introducing any documents or other demonstrative evidence and from
DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1
TO EXCLUDE DOCUMENTS, TESTIMONY AND OTHER EVIDENCE REQUESTED
BUT NOT DISCLOSED DURING DISCOVERY
-l-
Document Filed Date
January 26, 2017
Case Filing Date
October 15, 2015
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 10/01/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.