arrow left
arrow right
  • JOSE A PAREDES VS OC AUTO EXCHANGE INC ET AL Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JOSE A PAREDES VS OC AUTO EXCHANGE INC ET AL Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 “ Ae @ Robert B. Mobasseri (SBN 193193) Amy L. Hajduk (SBN 230211) David Alan Cooper (SBN 190203) LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT B. MOBASSERI, P.C. FILE! alton Cour angeles 515 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1200 ty of LOS Los Angeles, CA 90071-3329 Tel: (213) 282-2000 Fax: (213) 282-3000 ex lini 2 oficete™ gharRC Attorneys for Plaintiff Jenny Crea JOSE A. PAREDES SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 11 JOSE A. PAREDES; Case No.: BC620889 12 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO 13 vs. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 OC AUTO EXCHANGE, INC., d/b/a “LA Hearing 15 Auto Exchange,” a California corporation; December 5, 2016 ALLY BANK, a Utah corporation; HUDSON 8:30 am 16 INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware Department 78 17 corporation; DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, 18 Defendants 19 20 COMES NOW Plaintiff Jose Paredes and opposes Defendants’ Motion to Compel 21 binding arbitration and for costs on the following grounds: 22 I SUMMARY 23 This consumer protection action arises out of Plaintiff's June 22, 2015 purchase of a used 24 Hyundai Genesis vehicle which, as Plaintiff discovered, was sold with engine defects and 25, undisclosed frame damage. The engine failed soon after purchase. The vehicle is unusable. Defendants’ petition to compel arbitration, stay proceedings, and for costs must be denied for several reasons, including that: 28 1 PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION