On May 18, 2016 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Mintzer David,
and
Ford Motor Company,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
e
OLGA MATROSOVA, ESQ. (SBN: 270402)
OLGA.MATROSOVA@LECLAIRRYAN.COM
LECLAIRRYAN, LLP
sepa ED ai
725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 350 ‘County
Of Les Angeles
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5428
PHONE: 213-488-0503
FAX: 213-624-3755 OCT 20 2016
Sherri K. var necunve Offices/Clerk
oe
'
By, Deputy
Attorneys for Defendant
Ford Motor Company
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FAXED
10
11 DAVID MINTZER, Case No.: BC620944
12 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR
COMPANY’S ANSWER TO
13 Vv. PLAINTIFF DAVID MINTZER’S
14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, AND DOES 1
UNVERIFIED COMPLAINT aie
THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, Assigned for All Purposes to
15 Honorable John P. Doyle
Defendants. Department 58
16
Complaint Filed: May 18, 2016 ,
17
18
19
20 Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (“Defendant”), for itself alone and no other
21 defendant, hereby answers the unverified complaint of Plaintiff on file as follows:
22
23
General Denial
24 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 431.30(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, Defendant
ee
2 25 denies, generally and specifically, all of the
ho
allegations contained in the Complaint and
be 26 specifically denies that it caused or contributed to any alleged damages, and further denies that
ho
BP
ne 27 Plaintiff
has been or will be damaged in any sum or sums, either as alleged, otherwise, or at all.
an
28
1
DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF DAVID MINTZER’S UNVERIFIED
COMPLAINT
Document Filed Date
October 20, 2016
Case Filing Date
May 18, 2016
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
e OLGA MATROSOVA, ESQ. (SBN: 270402) OLGA.MATROSOVA@LECLAIRRYAN.COM LECLAIRRYAN, LLP sepa ED ai 725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 350 ‘County Of Les Angeles Los Angeles, CA 90017-5428 PHONE: 213-488-0503 FAX: 213-624-3755 OCT 20 2016 Sherri K. var necunve Offices/Clerk oe ' By, Deputy Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FAXED 10 11 DAVID MINTZER, Case No.: BC620944 12 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S ANSWER TO 13 Vv. PLAINTIFF DAVID MINTZER’S 14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, AND DOES 1 UNVERIFIED COMPLAINT aie THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, Assigned for All Purposes to 15 Honorable John P. Doyle Defendants. Department 58 16 Complaint Filed: May 18, 2016 , 17 18 19 20 Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (“Defendant”), for itself alone and no other 21 defendant, hereby answers the unverified complaint of Plaintiff on file as follows: 22 23 General Denial 24 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 431.30(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, Defendant ee 2 25 denies, generally and specifically, all of the ho allegations contained in the Complaint and be 26 specifically denies that it caused or contributed to any alleged damages, and further denies that ho BP ne 27 Plaintiff has been or will be damaged in any sum or sums, either as alleged, otherwise, or at all. an 28 1 DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF DAVID MINTZER’S UNVERIFIED COMPLAINT