arrow left
arrow right
  • JAMES YUN VS. KLF LOGISTICS, INC., ET. AL. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JAMES YUN VS. KLF LOGISTICS, INC., ET. AL. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/27/2019 10:39 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by K. Johnson,Deputy Clerk 1 Rosemary Amezcua-Moll SBN 223875 Rose@amalaw.net 2 Sarah J. Nowels, SBN 273471 3 Sarah@amalaw.net AMEZCUA-MOLL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 4 1122 East Lincoln Avenue, Suite 203 Orange, CA 92865 5 Telephone: 714-288-2826 6 Facsimile: 714-464-4536 Attorney for Plaintiff JAMES YUN 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES—COMPTON COURTHOUSE 10 11 JAMES YUN, an Individual, Unlimited Civil Case 12 Case No.: TC028535 Plaintiff, 13 vs. Assigned for all purposes to: The Honorable, Maurice A. Leiter Dept. A 14 KLF LOGISTICS, INC., a California Corporation; KL FENIX CORP., a California PLAINTIFF’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 15 HIS MOTION TO TAX AND/OR STRIKE Corporation; and DOES 1 to 30, inclusive, 16 DEFENDANTS’ COSTS Defendants. 17 Complaint Filed: August 22, 2016 Trial Date: August 20, 2018 18 19 Hearing Date: April 4, 2019 Hearing Time: 9:09 a.m. 20 Dept: A 21 22 Plaintiff submits the following Reply in support of his Motion to Strike and/or Tax Costs. 23 I. INTRODUCTION 24 As detailed in the moving papers, Plaintiff maintains that the costs requested in the motion 25 were reasonably incurred to prove first that he was misclassified as an independent contractor and 26 then that Defendants failed to provide him accurate wage statements and he is the prevailing party 27 as to all Defendants based on the § 998 offer. 28 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO TAX AND/OR STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ COSTS Case No.: TC028535 Assigned to: Hon. Maurice A. Leiter, Dept. A