On June 02, 2016 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Dewitt Kurt Von Kraemer,
and
Asham Mena Nashat,
Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Mta,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
KURT VON KRAEMER DEWITT.
IN PRO-PER
FIL D
Superior Court 0! ¢ Angeles
California
108 BROOKSTONE RD. County of Los
KILLEN, AL 35645
Phone: 818-669-1190 MAR 11 2019
Email: galacticpigproductions@gmail.com
arter, Executliy Officer/Clerk
Sherr
Deput
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CA'
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOSANGELES
CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT
KURT VON KRAEMER DEWITT, AN INDIVIDUAL Case No.: BC622255
Plaintiff,
vs. ANSWER TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE
10 NUMBER 8.
MENA NASHAT ASHRAM,AN
1 INDIVIDUAL;METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY DBA MTA, FORM UNKNOWN AND
12 DOES | TO 25 , INCLUSIVE
13 Defendants
14 To Defendants and court: The Plaintiff objects to the motion Limine 8, produced by the
15
defendant.
16
LET IT BE KNOWN: The Plaintiff never agreed to dismiss or abrogate punitive damages on the
17
aforementioned case, period. The exact opposite. The plaintiff now self-represents and objects
18 to
19 any abrogation of possible punitive damages for negligence on behal
of fthe MTA.
20
21
HISTORY 1: The Law Firm ( and legal case mill) Celino and Barnes were dismissed (fired) by
22
the Plaintiff for failing to inform the Plaintiff
of events and communication between the
23.
Defendants and the Plaintiff. The plaintiff had to go to war with the Senior Partners and threaten
24
25, state bar actions to even get copies of his document. In addition, the plaintiff removed the former|
26 attorney David Koppelman. Esq. for malfeasance, fraud, client manipulation — in regard
to legal
27 funding - dereliction of duty, and for attempted perjury on evidentiary documentation.
28
ANSWER TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE NUMBER 8. - |
Document Filed Date
March 11, 2019
Case Filing Date
June 02, 2016
Status
Jury Verdict 04/03/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
KURT VON KRAEMER DEWITT. IN PRO-PER FIL D Superior Court 0! ¢ Angeles California 108 BROOKSTONE RD. County of Los KILLEN, AL 35645 Phone: 818-669-1190 MAR 11 2019 Email: galacticpigproductions@gmail.com arter, Executliy Officer/Clerk Sherr Deput SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CA' FOR THE COUNTY OF LOSANGELES CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT KURT VON KRAEMER DEWITT, AN INDIVIDUAL Case No.: BC622255 Plaintiff, vs. ANSWER TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE 10 NUMBER 8. MENA NASHAT ASHRAM,AN 1 INDIVIDUAL;METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY DBA MTA, FORM UNKNOWN AND 12 DOES | TO 25 , INCLUSIVE 13 Defendants 14 To Defendants and court: The Plaintiff objects to the motion Limine 8, produced by the 15 defendant. 16 LET IT BE KNOWN: The Plaintiff never agreed to dismiss or abrogate punitive damages on the 17 aforementioned case, period. The exact opposite. The plaintiff now self-represents and objects 18 to 19 any abrogation of possible punitive damages for negligence on behal of fthe MTA. 20 21 HISTORY 1: The Law Firm ( and legal case mill) Celino and Barnes were dismissed (fired) by 22 the Plaintiff for failing to inform the Plaintiff of events and communication between the 23. Defendants and the Plaintiff. The plaintiff had to go to war with the Senior Partners and threaten 24 25, state bar actions to even get copies of his document. In addition, the plaintiff removed the former| 26 attorney David Koppelman. Esq. for malfeasance, fraud, client manipulation — in regard to legal 27 funding - dereliction of duty, and for attempted perjury on evidentiary documentation. 28 ANSWER TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE NUMBER 8. - |