Order: DIANA ANSON VS FAITH POINTER

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                -                                    O                         .            0                                             3\
                                                                               Superior Court of California          1        _ FQ                                       »
                                 1                                                                                       S”ge"'°’ COW Of California
                                                                                  County ofLos Angeles                      °“'"V °’ ‘-05 Angetes
                                 2                                                    Department 31                          NOV 1 @2013 @
                                 3                                                                                Kfherri R Ct. ,
                                                                                                                                            u we   rice,/C, k

                                4
                                                                                                                  7VT‘¥lé$?..5?3
                                                                                                                          we / -rum. Depuirl
     _                          ,5

                                          DIANA ANSON,                                            Case No.2 BC62422l
                                 6                            Plaintiff,
                                 7                   v.                                           Hearing Date: November 13, 2018
                                 8                                                                                    .                                              .

                                 9        FAITH POINTER, et al.,                                  [ RDER RE:


                                10        .                   Defendant(s).                       PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE
                                                                                                  TERMS OF SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO
                                “                                                                 C.C.P. § 664.6 TO ENFORCE
                        .       12    -                                                           SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

                                13                        ,                                              _                              .
                                14              ,
                                                     Plaintiffs Motion to Enforce Terms of Settlement Pursuant to C.C.P. § 664.6 to Enforce
                            -   15
                                16        Settlement Agreement is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to submit a proposed judgment,

                                17        consistent with the exact terms of the settlement agreement.

            4                   18                   Plaintiff Diana Anson moves the court to enforce the settlement agreement between the

                                19        parties.

                                20                   The settlement agreement expressly contains a provision granting jurisdiction to the
     '4 i".‘l' .
  !ié.%=i-.»§~
' kgffgél                       21        Court pursuant to CCP § 664.6. (Anson Decl. Ex. A at 6 1] 18.) The court must determine
     -‘ =: l«l=‘l-' '
                  5             22        whether the settlement agreement is valid and binding. (Kohn v. Jaymar-Ruby (1994) 23 Cal.
                  ;‘
     !;":""f"“                  23        App. 4th 1530, 1533.) Plaintiff Diana Anson states that the parties attended mediation on
                                24
                                          February 15, 2017, during which the partiesreached a settlement agreement, which is attached to
                                25‘                                                                                                 '
                                          her declaration as Exhibit A. (Anson Decl. 111] 4-5.) The parties mutually amended the

                                                                                              1