arrow left
arrow right
  • TANAZ ZAMANI VS CITY OF REDONDO BEACH ET AL Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • TANAZ ZAMANI VS CITY OF REDONDO BEACH ET AL Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Paul R. Markley, Esq.Bar No. 102784 FILED LAW OFFICES OF PAUL R. MARKLEY Superior Court of California 2790 Skypark Drive, Suite 106 Countv of T.ns Anceles Torrance, CA 90505 310-325-4004 310-325-9301 (fax) MAR 23.2018 Attorney for Plaintiff, Tanaz Zamani Sherri R, oe. secutive ee ierk of Cours , Deputy Judi Lara BY FAX SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 TANAZ ZAMANI, an individual, | CASE No. BC637727 Assigned to Hon. Holly J. Fujie 12 Plaintiff, Dept. 98 13 vs. MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ANY TESTIMONY FROM NON-PERCIPIENT 14 LAY WITNESS REGARDING THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH; GILBERT COTA; ROSA COTA and DOES 1-20, | LOCATION WHERE PLAINTIFF FELL 15 Inclusive, 16 | NUMBER SIX Defendants. 17 Complaint filed: 10/19/16 Trial Date: 4/19/18 18 19 TO ALL PARTIES, THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND TO 20 THE COURT: 21 On the date this matter proceeds to trial, Plaintiff Tanaz Zamani, moves that the Court 22 hear the within Motion in Limine. The issue upon which the Court is requested to rule is as 23 ; follows: 24 25 4 EXCLUDE ANY TESTIMONY, REFERENCE AND/OR EXHIBITS BY ALL ~ 26 DEFENDANTS.AND NON-PERCIPIENT WITNESSES AS TO LOCATION 27 WHERE PLAINTIFE.FELL. 28 MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ANY TESTIMONY FROM NON-PERCIPIENT LAY WITNESS REGARDING THE LOCATION WHERE PLAINTIFF FELL NUMBER SIX