arrow left
arrow right
  • TANAZ ZAMANI VS CITY OF REDONDO BEACH ET AL Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • TANAZ ZAMANI VS CITY OF REDONDO BEACH ET AL Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

ORIGINAL KENTON E. MOORE, STATE BAR #143645 FILED JULIAN S. SMITH, STATE BAR #309241 Superior Court of California McCUNE & HARBER, LLP County of Los A neeles 515 South Figueroa Street, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, California 90071 AUG 0.3 20167 Telephone: (213) 689-2500 Sherri gia. Sau uuive Utticer/Clerk Facsimile: (213) 689-2501 arte, fH kmoore@mccuneharber.com and jsmith@mccuneharber.com By. » Deputy ‘Samantha Chevas Attorneys for Defendant And Cross-Complainant, CITY OF REDONDO BEACH [FEE EXEMPT PUBLIC ENTITY, GOVERNMENT CODE § 6103] SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 vz ae 11 TANAZ ZAMANI, an individual, Case No: BC637727 are Assigned to Honorable Yolanda Ze 212 Plaintiff, Orozco/Department 7 Bae aE 13 (Complaint filed on October 19, 2016) soge aos Vv. BSeoR DATE: August 3, 2018 S9E 14 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH; GILBERT TIME: 8:30 a.m. COTA; ROSA COTA and DOES 1-20, DEPT.: 7 15 Inclusive, DEFENDANT CITY OF REDONDO BEACH’S 16 Defendants. OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME TO 17 AND ALL RELATED CROSS ACTIONS. HEAR A MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER CCP § 473; DECLARATION OF KENTON 18 MOORE, ESQ. 19 Trial Date: October 18, 2018 20 FSC Date: October 3, 2018 21 22 23 24 25 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 26 Defendant CITY OF REDONDO BEACH (“Defendant” or “City”) hereby opposes Plaintiff's cn 2 7 ex parte application to shorten time to hear plaintiff's motion for relief under Code of Civil Procedure § “2 8 473. Defendant’s Opposition is based on the following grounds: -1- cb pe JAWPDOCs\Zamani, T v. City of Redondo Beach\Pid\P's Ex Parte App for Order Short Time\Opp to P's Ex Parte.docx 11200032 no