On October 19, 2016 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Zamani Tanaz,
and
Arakelian Enterprises Inc. Dba Athens,
City Of Redondo Beach,
Cota Gilbert,
Cota Rosa,
Emmerson John,
Ghavami Ashkan,
Schaye Gordon,
Soma Medical Group Inc.,
Wu David,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
' Q» 1? -. I ’ . . ‘
_ 1 P au I R . M arkl ey, E sq. Bar N o. 10 2784 *:
2 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL R. MARKLEYI r c’ . .
Superribr Court of§aIif|o:nia A
2790 Skypark Drive, Suite 106 nae 9..
3 Ta?-ggge4,’oCA 90505 325 Cmmtv M‘ ,.M:
4 3 - - 04 31 0- -9 301 (ax)
f OCT 12 2018
5 Attorney for Plamtlff’ Tanaz Zamam Sllerri K. umi, mccuuve Ufcer/Clerk
By Baggy F9-17V-Q4,Depllfy .
6 “author Flnrnr
7 .
8 .
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V
9
FOR THE COUNTY LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT »
10 '
11 A A BY FAX I
.12 TANAZ ZAMANI, an individual, CASE NO. BC637727
Assigned to Hon. Holly J. Fujie ‘
13 Plaintiff, Dept. 7
14 vs. PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT CITY OF REDONDO
15 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH; GILBERT BEACH'S MOTION IN LIMINE, NO. 13,
COTA; ROSA COTA and DOES 1-20, TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ANY ;
16 Inclusive, SUBSEQUENT REMEDIAL _
MEASURES IN THE SUBJECT AREA; I
17 Defendants. = MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND A
AUTHORITIES
180 * Complaint filed: 10/19/16
19 Trial Date: 10/18/18 '
_ Hearing Date: Date of assignment for -
20 trial
21 »
- TO: THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
22 Plaintiff, Tanaz Zamani, hereby files the following opposition to the defendant City of I
23 Redondo Beach's Motion in Limine, No. 13, to exclude evidence of any subsequent remedial j
24 measures In the subject area... 1
2s
27 ’ P"=LA"IN‘TIFF”S"OPPOSITION TOTDEFENDANT CITY OF REDONDO BEACH'S MOTION j
' 28 - IN LIMINE, NO. 13, TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ANY SUBSEQUENT REMEDIAL ,
_ MEASURES IN THE SUBJECT AREA; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND OCCURRED; 1 2
_ ‘E MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES !
Document Filed Date
October 12, 2018
Case Filing Date
October 19, 2016
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
' Q» 1? -. I ’ . . ‘ _ 1 P au I R . M arkl ey, E sq. Bar N o. 10 2784 *: 2 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL R. MARKLEYI r c’ . . Superribr Court of§aIif|o:nia A 2790 Skypark Drive, Suite 106 nae 9.. 3 Ta?-ggge4,’oCA 90505 325 Cmmtv M‘ ,.M: 4 3 - - 04 31 0- -9 301 (ax) f OCT 12 2018 5 Attorney for Plamtlff’ Tanaz Zamam Sllerri K. umi, mccuuve Ufcer/Clerk By Baggy F9-17V-Q4,Depllfy . 6 “author Flnrnr 7 . 8 . SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V 9 FOR THE COUNTY LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT » 10 ' 11 A A BY FAX I .12 TANAZ ZAMANI, an individual, CASE NO. BC637727 Assigned to Hon. Holly J. Fujie ‘ 13 Plaintiff, Dept. 7 14 vs. PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CITY OF REDONDO 15 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH; GILBERT BEACH'S MOTION IN LIMINE, NO. 13, COTA; ROSA COTA and DOES 1-20, TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ANY ; 16 Inclusive, SUBSEQUENT REMEDIAL _ MEASURES IN THE SUBJECT AREA; I 17 Defendants. = MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND A AUTHORITIES 180 * Complaint filed: 10/19/16 19 Trial Date: 10/18/18 ' _ Hearing Date: Date of assignment for - 20 trial 21 » - TO: THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 Plaintiff, Tanaz Zamani, hereby files the following opposition to the defendant City of I 23 Redondo Beach's Motion in Limine, No. 13, to exclude evidence of any subsequent remedial j 24 measures In the subject area... 1 2s 27 ’ P"=LA"IN‘TIFF”S"OPPOSITION TOTDEFENDANT CITY OF REDONDO BEACH'S MOTION j ' 28 - IN LIMINE, NO. 13, TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ANY SUBSEQUENT REMEDIAL , _ MEASURES IN THE SUBJECT AREA; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND OCCURRED; 1 2 _ ‘E MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES !