arrow left
arrow right
  • TANAZ ZAMANI VS CITY OF REDONDO BEACH ET AL Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • TANAZ ZAMANI VS CITY OF REDONDO BEACH ET AL Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/22/2019 12:33 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by $. Lopez,Deputy Clerk Paul R. Markley, Esq. Bar No. 102784 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL R. MARKLEY 2790 Skypark Drive, Suite 106 Torrance, CA 90505 310-325-4004 310-325-9301 (fax) Attorney for Plaintiff, Tanaz Zamani SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 TANAZ ZAMANI, an individual, CASE NO. BC637727 Assigned to Hon. Mark A. Borenstein 12 Plaintiff, Dept. 35 13 vs. PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS GILBERT AND ROSA 14 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH; GILBERT COTA'S OPPOSITION TO COTA; ROSA COTA and DOES 1-20, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TAX 15 Inclusive, AND/OR STRIKE MEMORANDUM OF 16 COST: Defendants. Date: February 1, 2019 17 Time: 9:00 a.m. AND ALL RELATED CROSS ACTIONS. Dept.: 35 18 Complaint filed: 10/19/16 19 Trial Date: 10/18/18 20 21 Plaintiff Tanaz Zamani replies to defendants Gilbert and Rosa Cota's Opposition to 22 Plaintiff's Motion to Tax and/or Strike Memorandum of Costs of Defendants Gilbert and Rosa 23 Cota as follows: 24 4 The defendants offer of nothing was not in good faith. 25 26 2 Using the defendant’s logic, the costs of over $23,000.00 wold help establish 27 28 PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS GILBERT AND ROSA COTA'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TAX AND/OR STRIKE MEMORANDUM OF COSTS