Motion-Secondary: ANAHIT SHIRVANYAN VS L A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                e                                               @
           Jeffery J. Carlson (SBN 60752)                                     [Public Entity-No Filing Fee Required]
           Jeanne L. Zimmer (SBN                  123321)
           J. Grace Felipe (SBN 190893)
           CARLSON & MESSER LLP
           5901 W. Century Boulevard, Suite 1200                                                                   EF            D
           Los Angeles, California 90045                                                                Superior Court of California
           (310) 242-2200 Telephone                                                                        County af Unc Angeles
           (310) 242-2222 Facsimile
                                                                                                                 MAY 2 1 2018
           Attorneys for Defendant,
                                                                                                               t
                                                                                                  Sherri R. Carer, vxecutive Officer/
                                                                                                                                      Clerk of Court
           LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY
           COLLEGE DISTRICT                                                                       By.                                   7   Deputy
                                                                                                              Rav! Sanche~




                                          SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
      10                                                    COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
      1

      12
           ANAHIT            SHIRVANYAN,                             )    Case No.: BC633224

                                            Plaintiff,               )DEFENDANT, LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY
      13                                                              COLLEGE DISTRICT’S RESPONSE TO
                      vs.                                             SEPARATE STATEMENT OF ISSUES IN
      14                                                              SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’ OPPOSITION
           LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY                                      TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL
      15   COLLEGE DISTRICT; and DOES                         1      )FURTHER RESPONSE TO SPECIAL
           through 10, inclusive                                      INTERROGATORIES
      16
                                                                     ) [Filed Concurrently with Defendant’s
                                            Defendants.              ) Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel
      17
                                                                     ) Further Responses to Special Interrogatories;
      18
                                                                     ) Declaration of Jeanne L. Zimmer]
                                                                     )
      19                                                             Date:      June 4, 2018
                                                                     2 Time:    8:30 a.m.
      20                                                             ) Dept.: 19
      21
                                                                     )
      22

      23   TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS                                 OF RECORD:

      24              Defendant,           LOS      ANGELES       COMMUNITY           COLLEGE                DISTRICT,               respectfully
           submits          this     separate    statement,   pursuant   to   California       Rules     of Court          Rule,      3.1345,          in
      25
           opposition to Plaintiff, Anahit Shirvanyan’s, Motion to Compel Further Response to Special
      26
2          Interrogatories.            Set forth below are (a) Plaintiffs’ requests, (b) Defendant’s responses, and (c)
ba    27
           Defendant’s reasons to deny Plaintiffs’ motion to compel.
bad   28
go
to



           {00091898;1} (08624.00)                                               RESPONSE TO SEPARATE STATEMENT OF ISSUES