Motion-Secondary: ANAHIT SHIRVANYAN VS L A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                I -                            Q                               U|i(:u|NAL
                         .            Charles R. Messer (SBN: 101094)
                              ,1      Jeanne L. Zimmer (SBN 123321)                                                   FEILED
                                      J- Grace Felipe (SBN 190893)                                              superiorcoiiorceliforuia
                              2       CARLSON & MESSER LLP                                                         Cobty i3!"I466A!i11é|es
                                      5901 W. Century Boulevard, Suite 1200                                         A                _
                              3       Los Angeles, California 90045                                                        O9
                                      (310) 242-2200 Telephone
                              4       (310) 242-2222 Facsimile                                            Sherri    ¢'§a1rz3r,3e_e ‘rive Officer/clerk
                                                                                                           By                                Deputy
                              5       Attorneys for Defendant,                                                          “ “S”
                                      LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
                              6

        §                     7
        LI.                   8                                                     I                                                                     '
        >_                                                          SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

        93                   «9                                      _             COUNTY or LOS ANGELES
             I               10

                             11        ANAHIT SHIRVANYAN,                                   ) CASE NO. BC633224
                 .                                                                          )
                             12                                      Plaintiff,             ) DEFENDANT LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY
                                                                                            ) COLLEGE DISTRICT’S OPPOSITION TO
                             13                  vs.            b                             MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3; MEMORANDUM
                                                                                              OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
                             14       LOS ANGELESCOMMUNITY COLLEGE
P                            1 5 3I§;1§vIET; and DOES 1 thr°“gh 10’                         ) FSC DATE: November 27, 2018
                                                                                            )Time: 9:30 a.m. — Dept.: 19
                             16                                                             :)
                                                                     Defendants‘            ) Trial Date: December 4, 2018                               _A           V
                             17                                                             ) Time: 9:30 a.m. — Dept.: 19
                                                                                            .3

                             19 a TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

                             20 V.               Defendant LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT (“LACCD”) hereby

                             2]       submits this Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion in Limine No. 3 to exclude evidence of or reference to
                             22 I ‘                                                                                                                               =
        $15.;                      , Plaintiffs alleged misconduct at work (the “Motion”). For the reasons as set forth below, the Motion 1
        ;:.; i =;            23
                                   H should be denied.                     A
                     -       24 if


                             26       ///
                             27       ///
                             28
                                      1oo1u412o;1) (os624.oo)                           1                             LACCD’S Opposition to Plaintiffs
                                                                                                                                 Motion in Limine #3
    '                                                                                                                                         Case No. BC633224