On May 16, 2016 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Zepeda Jose,
and
Michno Pam Judgment,
Perras Joelean Judgment,
Starbucks Corporation,
Zepeda Jose,
for Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
@ @
FILED
Court
LAW OFFICES OF MARYANN P. GALLAGHER County Of! Los
Of Californis
Angeles
MARYANN P. GALLAGHER, SBN 146078
205 South Broadway, Suite 920
Los Angeles, California 90012
SEP 06 2017
Phone: (213) 626-1810 Sherri
R. Carter, Bxecuth Officen/Clerk
By. -
Fax: (213) 626-0961 " Deputy
E-mail: mail@mpg-law.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSE ZEPEDA
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
JOSE ZEPEDA, Case No. BC620585
1
Plaintiff, Assigned to the Honorable Gregory W. Alarcon
11 Dept. 36
Vv.
12 PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS
STARBUCKS CORPORATION; PAM AN AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO
13 MICHNO; and JOELEAN PERRAS; and DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATION
DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive,
MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
Defendants.
15
RESERVATION ID: 170113187545
16
Hearing Date: September 19, 2017
17 Dept: 36
Time: 8:30 a.m.
18
[Complaint Filed: May 16, 2016]
19
20
21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
22,
Plaintiff JOSE ZEPEDA provides the following evidence, in support of his opposition to
Starbucks Corporation Motion for Summary Judgement/Adjudication.
24
1 Defendants do not challenge the First through Five Causes of action for (1)
25
Pe Disability Discrimination in Violation of Govt Code 12940 et deq. (2) Failure
26
"27 to Engage in the Interactive Process and Failure to Accommodate (3)
2
28
oe Retaliation in Violation of Govt Code 12940 et seq. (4) Retaliation in Violation
Tab 1
PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANTS PAM MICHNO’S AND JOELEAN PERRAS’
Document Filed Date
September 06, 2017
Case Filing Date
May 16, 2016
Category
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Jury Verdict 04/27/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
@ @ FILED Court LAW OFFICES OF MARYANN P. GALLAGHER County Of! Los Of Californis Angeles MARYANN P. GALLAGHER, SBN 146078 205 South Broadway, Suite 920 Los Angeles, California 90012 SEP 06 2017 Phone: (213) 626-1810 Sherri R. Carter, Bxecuth Officen/Clerk By. - Fax: (213) 626-0961 " Deputy E-mail: mail@mpg-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSE ZEPEDA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT JOSE ZEPEDA, Case No. BC620585 1 Plaintiff, Assigned to the Honorable Gregory W. Alarcon 11 Dept. 36 Vv. 12 PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS STARBUCKS CORPORATION; PAM AN AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO 13 MICHNO; and JOELEAN PERRAS; and DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATION DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Defendants. 15 RESERVATION ID: 170113187545 16 Hearing Date: September 19, 2017 17 Dept: 36 Time: 8:30 a.m. 18 [Complaint Filed: May 16, 2016] 19 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22, Plaintiff JOSE ZEPEDA provides the following evidence, in support of his opposition to Starbucks Corporation Motion for Summary Judgement/Adjudication. 24 1 Defendants do not challenge the First through Five Causes of action for (1) 25 Pe Disability Discrimination in Violation of Govt Code 12940 et deq. (2) Failure 26 "27 to Engage in the Interactive Process and Failure to Accommodate (3) 2 28 oe Retaliation in Violation of Govt Code 12940 et seq. (4) Retaliation in Violation Tab 1 PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS PAM MICHNO’S AND JOELEAN PERRAS’