On May 16, 2016 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Zepeda Jose,
and
Michno Pam Judgment,
Perras Joelean Judgment,
Starbucks Corporation,
Zepeda Jose,
for Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
40
iS
aa
Superior Court of California FILED
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles County of Los Angeles
“Department 36 sep
19 207 ©
Sherri R. Carter, ive otcor rk
By. Deputy
ZEPEDA,
Case No.: BC620585
Plaintiff(s),
Hearing Date: 9/19/17
STARBUCKS CORP., RENPASEVE) RULING RE:
10 e DEFENDANT STARBUCKS
1 Defendant(s). . CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR
12 SUMMARY ADJ UDICATION AS
TO THE CAUSE OF ACTION FOR
13
INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF
14
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND THE
15 CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES.
16
17 DEFENDANTS PAM MICHNO’S
AND JOELEAN PERRAS’ MOTION
18
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR
19
ALTERNATIVELY SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION AS TO THE
24 CLAIMS FOR INTENTIONAL
INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL
22
& DISTRESS AND THE CLAIM FOR
we
ho PUNITIVE DAMAGES.
RO
Ss
& Both motions are granted entirely.
Document Filed Date
September 19, 2017
Case Filing Date
May 16, 2016
Category
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Jury Verdict 04/27/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
40 iS aa Superior Court of California FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles County of Los Angeles “Department 36 sep 19 207 © Sherri R. Carter, ive otcor rk By. Deputy ZEPEDA, Case No.: BC620585 Plaintiff(s), Hearing Date: 9/19/17 STARBUCKS CORP., RENPASEVE) RULING RE: 10 e DEFENDANT STARBUCKS 1 Defendant(s). . CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR 12 SUMMARY ADJ UDICATION AS TO THE CAUSE OF ACTION FOR 13 INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF 14 EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND THE 15 CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES. 16 17 DEFENDANTS PAM MICHNO’S AND JOELEAN PERRAS’ MOTION 18 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR 19 ALTERNATIVELY SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AS TO THE 24 CLAIMS FOR INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL 22 & DISTRESS AND THE CLAIM FOR we ho PUNITIVE DAMAGES. RO Ss & Both motions are granted entirely.