arrow left
arrow right
  • JOSE ZEPEDA VS STARBUCKS CORPORATION ET AL Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JOSE ZEPEDA VS STARBUCKS CORPORATION ET AL Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

® @ ” SHEPPARD, MULLIN; RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations TRACEY A. KENNEDY, Cal. Bar No. 150782 tkennedy@sheppardmullin.com Sy ror ct BRETT D. YOUNG, Cal. Bar No. 305657 ‘ounty o 0f LEED me Los Angeles byoung@sheppardmullin.com 333 South Hope Street, 43" Floor AUS 09 2016 Los Angeles, California 90071-1422 Sherri R. Carter, Telephone: 213.620.1780 By utive Officer/Clerk Facsimile: 213.620.1398 puty Attorneys for Defendants STARBUCKS CORPORATION, PAM MICHNO and JOELEAN PERRAS SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 11 12 JOSE ZEPEDA, Case No. BC620585 13 Plaintiff, Assigned to the Honorable Gregory W. Alarcon] 14 Dept. 3 . Vv. 15 DEFENDANT STARBUCKS STARBUCKS CORPORATION; PAM CORPORATION’S ANSWER TO 16 MICHNO; and JOELEAN PERRAS; and PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, COMPLAINT 17 Defendants. 18 [Complaint Filed: May 16, 2016] 19 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR 7 ORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 AVon Brim ro a5 mm DPA aS oy, 23 Defendant Starbucks Corporation (“Defendant”), for aseltanda DBA oA 24 defendants, hereby answers the unverified First Amended Complaifit pedby 2 RFE OSE ag 25 Zepeda as follows: 8 a 26 Qe a 27 a 2 28 a: tM te ooa oO Seao eoeaq ‘ae SMRH:477996276.1 STARBUCKS’ ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT