On October 11, 2016 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Noor Roger,
and
Piograph Ventures Llc,
Tabello Hanny Doe 1,
Tabello Omar Dismissed,
Telegraph Ventures Llc,
Telegraph Ventures Llc Erroneously Sued,
Wright Margaret E.,
Pub Maggie'S,
for Civil Rights/Discrimination (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
@
Apr 17 2017 00:42 HP Fax me page 2
Supertor Court Of Califorate
J.T. Fox, Esq., SBN 195063 ountyOf Los Angeles
LAW OFFICES OF JT FOX & ASSOC., APC
556 S. Fair Oaks Ave., Suite 444 APR.17 2017
Pasadena, CA 91105
Sherriic. vavwyr,
fa
(888) 750-5530 Work xecutive Officer/Clerk
(888) 750-5530 Fax By Deputy
E-Mail: je@jtfoxlaw.com
Attorney for Defendant,
PIOGRAPH VENTURES, LLC
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 ROGER NOOR, Case No.: BC636882
11 DEFENDANT PIOGRAPH VENTURES,
Plaintiff, LLC’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
12 AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND
Vv. FOR JURY TRIAL
13
MARGARET E. WRIGHT dba MAGGIE'S
14 PUB, et al Dept. 40
15 Defendants.
16
17
18 UV In response to the First Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) of Plaintiff, Defendant
19 PIOGRAPH VENTURES, LLC (“Defendant”), for themselves alone, state as follows for their
20 answer and affirmative defenses
21 INTRODUCTION
22 1 Comes now Defendant PIOGRAPH VENTURES, LLC (hereinafter teferred:t 40:a8-m re
38
23 "Defendant") answering the Complaint, for themselves alone and for no other defendantsaddi deny!
sooom aE 4 R @
24 and allege as follows: Under the provisions of Section 431.30 of the cai ie sade af <€ivilh =
25 P. ¢, this answering Defendant denies each and every allegation in said Gmpiaint, a dgnies
go 26 that the Plaintiff sustained any injury and/or damages in the sums alleged or in any other:sum or| “9
ge ay 8
bed 27 sums, or in any way or at all, by reason of any act, breach or omission on the part of this ougiring
pea 28 Defendant, or on the part of any agent, servant, or employee of this Defendants
4g? Ci ve ae we
be
-1- Mao gd
i et St
DEFENDANT'S ANG58; FOWHAUNMTIAF’ S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT: 8 o
Document Filed Date
April 17, 2017
Case Filing Date
October 11, 2016
Category
Civil Rights/Discrimination (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 03/13/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
@ Apr 17 2017 00:42 HP Fax me page 2 Supertor Court Of Califorate J.T. Fox, Esq., SBN 195063 ountyOf Los Angeles LAW OFFICES OF JT FOX & ASSOC., APC 556 S. Fair Oaks Ave., Suite 444 APR.17 2017 Pasadena, CA 91105 Sherriic. vavwyr, fa (888) 750-5530 Work xecutive Officer/Clerk (888) 750-5530 Fax By Deputy E-Mail: je@jtfoxlaw.com Attorney for Defendant, PIOGRAPH VENTURES, LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGER NOOR, Case No.: BC636882 11 DEFENDANT PIOGRAPH VENTURES, Plaintiff, LLC’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND Vv. FOR JURY TRIAL 13 MARGARET E. WRIGHT dba MAGGIE'S 14 PUB, et al Dept. 40 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 UV In response to the First Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) of Plaintiff, Defendant 19 PIOGRAPH VENTURES, LLC (“Defendant”), for themselves alone, state as follows for their 20 answer and affirmative defenses 21 INTRODUCTION 22 1 Comes now Defendant PIOGRAPH VENTURES, LLC (hereinafter teferred:t 40:a8-m re 38 23 "Defendant") answering the Complaint, for themselves alone and for no other defendantsaddi deny! sooom aE 4 R @ 24 and allege as follows: Under the provisions of Section 431.30 of the cai ie sade af <€ivilh = 25 P. ¢, this answering Defendant denies each and every allegation in said Gmpiaint, a dgnies go 26 that the Plaintiff sustained any injury and/or damages in the sums alleged or in any other:sum or| “9 ge ay 8 bed 27 sums, or in any way or at all, by reason of any act, breach or omission on the part of this ougiring pea 28 Defendant, or on the part of any agent, servant, or employee of this Defendants 4g? Ci ve ae we be -1- Mao gd i et St DEFENDANT'S ANG58; FOWHAUNMTIAF’ S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT: 8 o