arrow left
arrow right
  • *** COMPLEX *** Anzora -v- Inland Behavioral and Health Services, Inc. et al Print Complex Civil Unlimited  document preview
  • *** COMPLEX *** Anzora -v- Inland Behavioral and Health Services, Inc. et al Print Complex Civil Unlimited  document preview
  • *** COMPLEX *** Anzora -v- Inland Behavioral and Health Services, Inc. et al Print Complex Civil Unlimited  document preview
  • *** COMPLEX *** Anzora -v- Inland Behavioral and Health Services, Inc. et al Print Complex Civil Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

Maria C. Roberts, SBN 137907 mroberts@greeneroberts.com Dessi N. Day, SBN 207699 dday@greeneroberts.com Noel J. Meza, SBN 331 169 nmeza@greeneroberts.com GREENE & ROBERTS 402 West Broadway, Suite 1025 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 398-3400 FAX Facsimile: (619) 330-4907 V ne Taylor, Dam), BY Attorneys for Defendant Inland Behavioral and Health Services, Inc., a California corporation SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 JOSEPH ANZORA, as an aggrieved Case No. CIVSB2218375 11 employee, and on behalf of all other Judge: Hon. David Cohn aggrieved employees under the Labor Code Action Date: August 22, 2022 12 Private Attomeys’ General Act of 2004, Trial Date: Not Yet Set 13 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF 14 V. MOTION BY DEFENDANT INLAND BEHAVIORAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, 15 INLAND BEHAVIORAL AND HEALTH INC. TO STAY CASE PENDING SERVICES, INC. a California corporation 3 OUTCOME OF EARLIER FILED AND 16 and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, RELATED CASE 17 Defendants. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO 18 STAY; DECLARATION OF MARIA C. ROBERTS; REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL 19 NOTICE 20 Date: April 10, 2023 Time: 10:00 a.m. 21 Dept: $26 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY I. INTRODUCTION This case, filed by JOSEPH ANZORA, is one 0f four duplicative wage and hour lawsuits filed against Inland Behavioral and Health Services, Inc (IBHS) and its Chief Executive Officer, Temetry Ann Lindsey, since June of 2021. A11 four cases were filed by the Bibiyan Law Group on behalf of various former IBHS employees and arise out of the same facts and allegations. The following is a summary of the cases filed: \OOO\IO\ l. On June 24, 2021, Bibiyan filed thefirst case against IBHS and Dr. Lindsey on behalf of Plaintiff, Edith Franco, alleging various wage and hour violations and asserting these claims individually and 0n a putative class basis (“First Case”). (Exh. 10 1.) 11 2. On October 1, 2021, Bibiyan filed the second case against IBHS and Dr. Lindsey 0n behalf of Plaintiffs Edith Franco and Monica Alfaro, alleging a single claim for 12 alleged violations of the Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”), (“Second Case”). 13 This case is based on the same facts and allegations as the First Case. (Exh. 2.) 14 3. On January 4, IBHS and Dr. Lindsey on 2022, Bibiyan filed the third case against behalf of Plaintiff Gloria Acuna, also alleging a single claim for alleged Violations of 15 the Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”), (“Third Case”). All claims pled in this case are included in those pled in the Second Case and this case is based on the same 16 facts and allegations as the First and Second Cases. (Exh. 3.) 17 4. On August 22, 2022, Bibiyan filed this case, thefourth case against IBHS and Dr. 18 Lindsey on behalf of Plaintiff JOSEPH ANZORA, also alleging a single claim for alleged violations of the Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”), (“Fourth Case”). 19 A11 claims pled in this case are included in those pled in the Second Case and this case is based on the same facts and allegations as the First, Second and Third Cases. (Exh. 20 4.) 21 The four complaints filed by the Bibiyan firm are Virtually identical and contain the same facts, 22 legal theories and alleged Labor Code Violations. All four cases are subject to a Case 23 Management Order and all are now assigned to the Complex Department, Dept. 826, before the 24 Hon. David Cohn. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY