arrow left
arrow right
  • ROSH INVESTMENTS LLC VS SHARONA YEHUDA ET AL Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ROSH INVESTMENTS LLC VS SHARONA YEHUDA ET AL Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

® BRIAN M. GROSSMAN (SBN 166681) NICKOLAS BREWSTER SOLISH (SBN 276468) FILED TESSER | GROSSMAN LLP Sy rior Court of California 11990 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 300 ounty of Los Angeles Los Angeles, California 90049 Tel: (310) 207-4558 MAY 10 2017 Fax: (424) 256-2689 deellau! Sanchez hem ‘Sherri Py Garter,Exgcutive Officer/Clerk Attorneys for Plaintiff By, 4 Deputy ROSH INVESTMENTS LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 11 ROSH INVESTMENTS LLC, a California) Case No.: BC 647344 limited liability company, 12 [Hon. Deidre Hill, Dept. 49] Plaintiff, 13 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR: VS. 14 (1) INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE SHARONA YEHUDA, as Trustee of the WITH PROSPECTIVE 15 Keshet Inter Vivos Trust, YORAM ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE; YEHUDA, individually and d/b/a MALIBU ) (2) SLANDER OF TITLE; and 16 CONSTRUCTION, d/b/a MALIBU ) (3) DECLARATORY RELIEF DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ) 17 and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Complaint Filed: January 18, 2017 18 Defendants. Trial Date: None Set 19 20 21 Plaintiff Rosh Investments LLC alleges for its First Amended Complaint as follows: 22 23 PARTIES 24 1 Plaintiff Rosh Investments LLC (“Rosh”) is, and at all times material hereto was, 25 limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place o 26 of business located in Los Angles County, California. mt ~ 27 2 Rosh is informed and believes, and based thereon alleges that defendant Sharona 2 a 28 Yehuda (“Sharona”) is, and at all times material hereto was, an individual residing in Los Angeles FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT