arrow left
arrow right
  • CARY W GOLDSTEIN VS EMILIA KIPERSHMIT Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CARY W GOLDSTEIN VS EMILIA KIPERSHMIT Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

if tanW. Goldstein; Esq., P. c. (SBN: 85947) ‘FILED Supe rior Court of Califo Sarah ‘C. Clark, Es sq, (SBN: 258665) ‘ounty of Los Angete rnia GOLDSTEIN | CLA\ s: An Assouation of Attorne 8840. ilshire Blvd., 2" Floor DEC 14 2017 Beverly Hills, CA'90214 SherriTK BR. Cay ‘ecutiveve Oficer/Clerk By. “Deputy Telephone 310.273.7777 Verofica Soe E-mail: cwg@palimony90210 Attorneys for Plaintiffs RECEIVED CARY W. GOLDSTEIN CARY W. GOLDSTEIN, ESQ,,.P.C. Cee 06 2017 DEPT, 69 SUPERIOR COURT. OF THE. STATE: OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES-CENTRAL DISTRICT © 14 } Case No: poeéoees 42 CARY W. GOLDSTEIN, CARY W. GOLDSTEIN, ESQ., PC. 13 ORDERON PLAINTIFF'S 14 MOTION® " OR REQUEST . FOR ND WO ADMISSIONS (SET: TO. BE Plaintiff, DEEMED ADMITTED AND NETARY SANCTIONS ‘PAYABLE: BY VS DEFENDANT 17 EMILIA KIPERSHMIT, an individual, and Does 1 to. 10, inclusive. 18 19 Defendarits ) 20 ) 21 On October 19, 2017 Plaintiff. Cary. W. Goldstein <" Plaint iff) filed a. Notice of ¢ 22 Motion ‘and Motion for, Requests for Admissions (Set One) to: ‘be déemed admitted and 23 monetary sanctions . payable by Defendant: Emilia, Kipershmit (‘Defendant’), Plaintiff's 24 Motion, was. scheduled to’be heard at 9: 30.a:m.-on Nove mber 27,.2047 in Department 25 69 of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Having received no papers opposing. Plaintiff's Motion for Request for Admissions (Set One) to be. deem ed admitted and: monetary 27. ‘Sanctions payable by Defendant, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Non-O pposition.on-November. 28 4 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’ S MOTIONFOR REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO BE DEEMED ADMITTED ‘AND: MONETA RY SANCTIONS." Goldstein v: Kipers hmit /LASC Case No: BC650866