On February 15, 2017 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
441 North Oakhurst Drive Condominium -,
and
Beverly Hills City Of,
Etco Homes Inc. Doe Defendant,
for Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
e
ORIGINAL
NEWMEYER & DILLION LLP SuperiorCo,
CAROL SHERMAN ZAIST, CBN 203995 county Ore Los
Tt of‘anaiornia
895 Dove Street, 5th Floor
Newport Beach, California 92660
(949) 854-7000; (949) 854-7099 (Fax)
OCT 20 2917
Attorneys for Defendant Clerk
ETCO HOMES, INC., DOE NO. 1 Gomez Deputy
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
441 NORTH OAKHURST DRIVE CASE NO. BC650752 dD 7 7
CONDOMINIUM OWNER'S JUDGE: Hon. BennyC. Osorio
10 ASSOCIATION, INC.
ANSWER BY DOE DEFENDANT ETCO
11
12 VS.
Plaintiff, HOMES, INC. TO FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
FILE DATE: February 15, 2017
ex}
13 CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, and DOES TRIAL DATE SET: No Date Set ol
1-100, inclusive,
14
Defendant.
15
16
17 Doe Defendant ETCO Homes, Inc. (“‘Defendant,” or “ETCO”) responds to 441 North
18 Oakhurst Drive Condominium Owners’ Association, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Association”) First
19 Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) as follows.
20 GENERAL DENIAL
21 1 By virtue of the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30,
22 Defendant denies each and every allegation contained in the Complaint, and each purported cause
23 of action contained therein, and further denies that Plaintiff sustained damage in the sums alleged
24 or in any sum, or at all, by reason of any act, breach, or omission on the part of Defendant or on
25 the part of any actual or putative agent, servant, representative, employee, predecessor, or
26 successor of either or both of Defendant.
27 Ml
@ Ml
~ 28
me 7191189.1
wi
ETCO HOMES, INC.’S ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
2
od
Document Filed Date
October 20, 2017
Case Filing Date
February 15, 2017
Category
Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 04/16/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
e ORIGINAL NEWMEYER & DILLION LLP SuperiorCo, CAROL SHERMAN ZAIST, CBN 203995 county Ore Los Tt of‘anaiornia 895 Dove Street, 5th Floor Newport Beach, California 92660 (949) 854-7000; (949) 854-7099 (Fax) OCT 20 2917 Attorneys for Defendant Clerk ETCO HOMES, INC., DOE NO. 1 Gomez Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 441 NORTH OAKHURST DRIVE CASE NO. BC650752 dD 7 7 CONDOMINIUM OWNER'S JUDGE: Hon. BennyC. Osorio 10 ASSOCIATION, INC. ANSWER BY DOE DEFENDANT ETCO 11 12 VS. Plaintiff, HOMES, INC. TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FILE DATE: February 15, 2017 ex} 13 CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, and DOES TRIAL DATE SET: No Date Set ol 1-100, inclusive, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 Doe Defendant ETCO Homes, Inc. (“‘Defendant,” or “ETCO”) responds to 441 North 18 Oakhurst Drive Condominium Owners’ Association, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Association”) First 19 Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) as follows. 20 GENERAL DENIAL 21 1 By virtue of the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30, 22 Defendant denies each and every allegation contained in the Complaint, and each purported cause 23 of action contained therein, and further denies that Plaintiff sustained damage in the sums alleged 24 or in any sum, or at all, by reason of any act, breach, or omission on the part of Defendant or on 25 the part of any actual or putative agent, servant, representative, employee, predecessor, or 26 successor of either or both of Defendant. 27 Ml @ Ml ~ 28 me 7191189.1 wi ETCO HOMES, INC.’S ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 2 od