arrow left
arrow right
  • JAMES GONIS VS MTC FINANCIAL, INC.,  ET AL., Mortgage Foreclosure (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JAMES GONIS VS MTC FINANCIAL, INC.,  ET AL., Mortgage Foreclosure (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/25/2019 04:02 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Watson,Deputy Clerk 1 YU | MOHANDESI LLP 2 B. Ben Mohandesi (SBN 214921) 213.377.5505 | bmohandesi@yumollp.com 3 Pavel Ekmekchyan (SBN 223222) 213.985.2007 | pavel@yumollp.com 4 Sheri Guerami (SBN 265231) 213.418.9340 | sguerami@yumollp.com 5 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 2800 Los Angeles, CA 90071 6 213.377.5501 Facsimile 7 Attorneys for Defendants NewRez LLC, F/K/A New Penn Financial, LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and 8 Bank of America, N.A. 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 11 JAMES GONIS, an individual, MARIE GONIS, Case No.: SC126982 an individual, 633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 2800 12 DEFENDANTS’ EVIDENTIARY Los Angeles, CA 90071 YU | MOHANDESI LLP Plaintiffs, OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION 13 OF KAIVAN HAROUNI IN SUPPORT OF vs. 14 PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO MTC FINANCIAL, INC., dba TRUSTEE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 15 CORPS, a California corporation; BANK OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AKA ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY 16 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a national banking ADJUDICATION association organized under the laws of the 17 United States of America; NEW PENN Date: January 31, 2019 FINANCIAL, LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage 18 Servicing, a limited liability company; OCWEN Time: 8:30 a.m. LOAN SERVICING, LLC, a limited liability Dept.: K 19 company, and DOES 2 through 20, inclusive Reservation ID: 181031361357 20 Defendants. Hon. Lawrence Cho 21 22 Action Filed: January 27, 2017 Trial Date: March 4, 2019 23 [Filed concurrently with Defendants’ Reply in 24 Support of Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication, 25 Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to 26 Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Objection to the Declaration of Kaivan 27 Harouni, and Reply to Plaintiffs’ Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of William Bible] 28 DEFENDANTS’ EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF KAIVAN HAROUNI