arrow left
arrow right
  • Mehta et al -v- San Bernardino Villas LP et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • Mehta et al -v- San Bernardino Villas LP et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • Mehta et al -v- San Bernardino Villas LP et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • Mehta et al -v- San Bernardino Villas LP et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

V \y Scott A. Blakeley, State Bar No. 251350 Jason Scupine, State Bar No. 150867 :wzeammfi:r§:;%x§rz CQUNTY Cw; SA‘N BERJNARDISEIA gum ”AN [’E‘Lfiqmm'N” ’3'STRICT David J. Ozeran, State Bar N0. 137452 LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON, DeHAAS, FESLER & AMES ‘ 701 North Brand Blvd., suite 600 - DEC) C 8 \ 2022 ‘ Glendale, California 91203-9877 I ' " Telephone (213) 426-3600 ° Facsimile (213) 426-3650 m, , OOOVONUl-BUJNr—l “C"fiYST K L K D'AM'CO. SAN BERNARDINO VILLAS LP dba Attorneys for Defendant, DEPUTY VILLAS AT SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER DISTRICT - AMES p—t O & FESLER b—I H SAROJ MEHTA, by and through her CASE NO.: CIVSB2216104 representative and attomey-in-fact, BHA VIN ’—I [\J MEHTA, Assigned for All Purposes To: DeHAAS, Judge Gilbert Ochoa ’—I U) Plaintiff, S24 H A vs. DECLARATION OF TRIAL ATTORNEY JOHNSON, PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF r—A U! SAN BERNARDINO VILLAS LP dba COURT RULE 375 VILLAS AT SAN BERNARDINO, and FOLLETTE, r—I 'O\ DOES 1 through 75, inclusive, TRIAL DATE: None Set ACTION FILED: 07/26/22 p—I fl Defendants. LA 0°. u—I p—d \O I, SCOTT A. BLAKELEY, declare and state as follows: NO 1. I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all of the courts in the State of N >-‘ California, and I am a shareholder in the law firm of LaFOLLETTE, JOHNSON, DeHAAS, FESLER & NN AMES. N DJ 2. That when this matter was assigned to this law firm, it was assigned to Scott A. Blakeley, NA individually, for all purposes, including trial. Consequently, this declarant and no other attorney in this N U1 firm is authorized to try this case and could not, therefore, be prepared to do so. N O\ 3. Given these circumstances, this declarant and no other attorney in this firm will be Nfl available and prepared to try this case. 28 /// f:\2442,43221 -1- 0021 -jjs-pld- decl of tn'al DECLARATION OF TRIAL ATTORNEY PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT RULE 375 attorney.docx \d \y 4. That Defendant, SAN BERNARDINO VILLAS LP dba VILLAS AT SAN BERNARDINO, has specifically requested that Scott A. Blakeley be its trial attorney and will not consent #WN to another attorney. 5. I am making this declarétion pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 375 (c) [Grounds for Continuance] and (d) [Other Factors to Be Considered]. Specifically, Rule 375 (d) 8 which requires the court to consider, "whether trial counsel is engaged in another trial;" if presented with a request to \OWQONUI continue the trial in this action. I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing is true and correct. AMES 1o Executed this gfifl day of December 2022, at Glendale, California. & 11 FESLER 12 SCOTT A. L LEY - Declarant DeHAAS, 13 14 JOHNSON, 15 FOLLETTE, 16 f7 LA 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c:\users\sblak - - 2 eley\appdata\l ocal\microsoft\ DECLARATION OF TRIAL ATTORNEY PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT RULE 375 wlndows\inetc n Ah n‘ nnnnnnn