arrow left
arrow right
  • Mehta et al -v- San Bernardino Villas LP et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • Mehta et al -v- San Bernardino Villas LP et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • Mehta et al -v- San Bernardino Villas LP et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
  • Mehta et al -v- San Bernardino Villas LP et al Print Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

Scott A. Blakeley, State Bar No. 251350 Jason Scupine, State Bar N0. 150867 David J. Ozeran, State Bar N0. 137452 LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON, DeHAAS, FESLER & AMEs F SUP I 701 North Brand Blvd., Suite 600 Glendale, California 91203-9877 cofi’zon cougrE D SAN BERT}; 0F SAN Bog CALIFORN UI-RUJN Telephone (213) 426-3600 - Facsimile (213) 426-3650 AHD'NO CIVTNggIIJéNo" ION Attorneys for Defendant, FEB Z 3 \OWNON SAN BERNARDINO VILLAS LP dba VILLAS AT SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WWW By m 2023 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO - CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER DISTRICT AMES 10 & FESLER 11 SAROJ MEHTA, by and through her CASE NO.: CIVSB2216104 representative and attomey-in-fact, BHA VIN 12 MEHTA, Assigned for All Purposes To: DeHAAS, Judge Gilbert Ochoa 13 Plaintiff, Dept. $24 14 vs. JOHNSON, P ORDER GRANTING 15 SAN BERNARDINO VILLAS LP dba ] EFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY ACTION v VILLAS AT SAN BERNARDINO, and x FOLLETTE, 16 DOES through 75, inclusive, 1 a 17 Defendants. LA 18 19 Defendant SAN BERNARDINO VILLAS LP dba VILLAS AT SAN BERNARDINO’S Motion 20 to Stay Action was scheduled for hearing on February 1, 2023 in Department $24 0f the above-entitled 21 court, the Honorable Gilbert Ochoa presiding. 22 Prior to the hearing, counsel for the Plaintiff and counsel for the Defendant both submitted 0n the 23 Court’s tentative ruling granting the motion, which thereby became the Court’s final ruling on the motion. 24 WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 25 The Court grants Defendant’s Motion t0 Stay Civil Proceedings, until such time as Bhavin Mehta 26 obtains an order from this Court appointing him as Saroj Mehta, guardian ad litem. Further because 27 Bhavin Mehta already has a power of attorney making him Saroj Mehta’s attorney-in-fact, the Court 28 orders that Plaintiff‘s counsel file an order appointing Bhavin Mehta as Saroj Mehta, guardian ad litem, _ 1 _ ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY ACTION w c 0’0 " “" 173% r“ 00““ 93 «0.0 Dc m5; a LY“ O03 @734 go“ a ‘a’ m—n)?“ ”S70 :3 us 23a a oo w, ‘32 oz; w z h . \ ' - V