arrow left
arrow right
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

PANISH SHEA & BOYLE LLP FILED BRIAN J. PANISH, STATE BAR No. 116060 Superior Court County of Los alifornia les DAVID RUDOREER: erate BAR NO. 254666 OCT 16 2049 RUDORFER@PSBLAW.COM 11111 SANTA MONICA BLVD., STE. 700 Sherri R. Cagter, § Exe ive Officer/Clerk Los ANGELES, CA 90025 ‘a Deputy § 10) 477-1700 By_ ae. TELEPHONE FACSIMILE: ( 10) 477-1699 SHERI E. MANUWAL, ESQ. SBN#106305 ROBERT I. MANUWAL, ESQ. SBN#102781 MANUWAL & MANUWAL 6300 CANOGA AVENUE, SUITE 590 WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367 TELEPHONE (818) 715-6040 FACSIMILE (818) 715-6030 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 13 JANE DOE, a minor, by and through her CASE NO.: BC662842 14 guardian ad litem, KATHRYN T. MCGUIGAN, [Case assigned to Hon. Judge Malcolm Mackey| 15 Department 55] Plaintiff, 16 PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO EX PARTE vs. APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO COMPEL| 17 PLAINTIFF’S INDEPENDENT MEDICAL] PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL EXAMINATION, OR IN THE 18 DISTRICT, et al., ALTERNATIVE SHORTENING TIME ON MOTION TO COMPEL 19 Defendants. DATE: October 17, 2019 20 TIME: 8:30 a.m. DEPT 55" 21 Complaint filed: May 25, 2017 22 TRIAL DATE: January 21, 2020 23 ih 24 COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE, and submits the following Opposition to 25, Defendants Pasadena Unified School Districts Ex Parte Application for Order to Compel 26 Plaintiffs Independent Medical Examination, or in the Alternative Shortening Time on a Motion Di to Compel Plaintiffs Independent Medical Examination. 28 Ml Plaintiff's Opposition to Ex Parte Application, etc. a