arrow left
arrow right
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/22/2022 07:17 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by K. Hung,Deputy Clerk 1 PANISH SHEA & BOYLE LLP BRIAN J. PANISH, State Bar No. 116060 2 panish@psblaw.com DAVID RUDORFER, State Bar No. 254666 3 rudorfer@psblaw.com 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700 4 Los Angeles, California 90025 Telephone: 310.477.1700 5 Facsimile: 310.477.1699 6 SHERI E. MANUWAL, State Bar No. 106305 ROBERT I. MANUWAL, State Bar No. 102781 7 MANUWAL & MANUWAL 100 N. Westlake Boulevard, Suite 203 8 Westlake Village, CA 91362 Telephone: 818.715.6040 9 Facsimile: 818.715.6030 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LLP 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700 310.477.1700 phone • 310.477.1699 fax 12 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT P ANISH S HEA & BOYLE Los Angeles, California 90025 13 14 "JANE DOE", a person with a disability by Case No. BC662842 and through her Guardian ad Litem 15 KATHRYN T. MCGUIGAN, [Assigned to Hon. Judge Malcolm Mackey, Dept. 55] 16 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 17 v. TO EXCLUDE SPECIFIC ARGUMENTS INTENDED ONLY TO INVOKE 18 PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, IMPROPER BIAS OR ANIMUS; a public entity; FOCUS POINT ACADEMY, MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND 19 a public entity; BRIAN MCDONALD, an individual; MICHAEL BELL, an individual; AUTHORITIES AND DECLARATION OF 20 KELLY RANEY, an individual; COUNTY DAVID RUDORFER OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, LOS 21 ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, a public entity; and DOES 1 [Complaint filed: 05/25/2017] 22 through 50, Inclusive, [Trial Date: 05/9/2022] 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 TO THE HONORABLE COURT, AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS 27 OF RECORD: 28 Plaintiff will move the Court for the issuance of the following Order in Limine: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 TO EXCLUDE SPECIFIC ARGUMENTS INTENDED ONLY TO INVOKE IMPROPER BIAS OR ANIMUS