arrow left
arrow right
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/27/2022 09:35 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariano,Deputy Clerk 1 NANCY P. DOUMANIAN, ESQ., SBN: 168925 DOUMANIAN & ASSOCIATES 2 837 South Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 200 Pasadena, California 91105 3 Telephone (626) 795-5802 Facsimile (626) 795-5832 4 Email: nancy@nancylaw.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant, PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a public entity, 6 PUBLIC ENTITY DEFENDANT, NO FILING FEE PER GOV’ T. CODE § 6103 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 JANE DOE, a minor, by and through her CASE NO. BC662842 guardian ad litem, KATHRYN T. [Assigned to the Hon. Malcolm H. Mackey, 12 MCGUIGAN, Dept. 55] 13 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 14 v. 16 TO PRECLUDE REFERENCE TO PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL MEETING 15 PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL WITH OR COMMUNICATING WITH DISTRICT, BRIAN MCDONALD, in His THE MINORS WHO SEXUALLY 16 Official Capacity as Superintendent of ASSAULTED PLAINTIFF Pasadena Unified School District, FOCUS 17 POINT ACADEMY, MICHAEL BELL, in DATE: APRIL 29. 2022 His Official Capacity as Principal of Focus TIME: 8: 30 AM 18 Point Academy, KELLY RANEY, in Her DEPT: 55 Official Capacity as Teacher at Focus Point 19 Academy, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a FSC: APRIL 29, 2022 public entity, LOS ANGELES TRIAL: MAY 9, 2022 20 DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, ROE 1, A MINOR, ROE PARENT 1-5; ROE 21 2, A MINOR, AND ROE PARENT 6-10, ROE 3, A MINOR, AND ROE PARENT 11- 22 15, AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, 23 Defendants. 24 25 COMES NOW Defendant PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and hereby 26 submits this opposition to Plaintiff JANE DOE’s motion in limine to preclude any reference to 27 28 -1- DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 16 TO PRECLUDE REFERENCE TO PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL MEETING WITH OR COMMUNICATING WITH THE MINORS WHO SEXUALLY ASSAULTED PLAINTIFF