arrow left
arrow right
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/27/2022 11:05 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariano,Deputy Clerk 1 NANCY P. DOUMANIAN, ESQ., SBN: 168925 DOUMANIAN & ASSOCIATES 2 837 South Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 200 Pasadena, California 91105 3 Telephone (626) 795-5802 Facsimile (626) 795-5832 4 Email: nancy@nancylaw.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant, PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a public entity, 6 PUBLIC ENTITY DEFENDANT, NO FILING FEE PER GOV’ T. CODE § 6103 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 JANE DOE, a minor, by and through her CASE NO. BC662842 guardian ad litem, KATHRYN T. [Assigned to the Hon. Malcolm H. Mackey, 12 MCGUIGAN, Dept. 55] 13 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 14 v. 6 TO EXCLUDE ALL DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF THE MINOR 15 PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL PLAINTIFF INVOLVING CONFUSION, DISTRICT, BRIAN MCDONALD, in His MANIPULATION OR 16 Official Capacity as Superintendent of MISREPRESENTATION OF ANY Pasadena Unified School District, FOCUS ASPECT OF THE DISCOVERY AND 17 POINT ACADEMY, MICHAEL BELL, in LITIGATION PROCESS His Official Capacity as Principal of Focus 18 Point Academy, KELLY RANEY, in Her DATE: APRIL 29. 2022 Official Capacity as Teacher at Focus Point TIME: 8:30 AM 19 Academy, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a DEPT: 55 public entity, LOS ANGELES 20 DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, FSC: APRIL 29, 2022 ROE 1, A MINOR, ROE PARENT 1-5; ROE TRIAL: MAY 9, 2022 21 2, A MINOR, AND ROE PARENT 6-10, ROE 3, A MINOR, AND ROE PARENT 11- 22 15, AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, 23 Defendants. 24 25 COMES NOW Defendant PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and hereby 26 submits this opposition to Plaintiff JANE DOE’s motion in limine to exclude all deposition 27 28 -1- DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 6 TO EXCLUDE ALL DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF THE MINOR PLAINTIFF INVOLVING CONFUSION, MANIPULATION OR MISREPRESENTATION OF ANY ASPECT OF THE DISCOVERY AND LITIGATION PROCESS