arrow left
arrow right
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/27/2022 11:05 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariano,Deputy Clerk 1 NANCY P. DOUMANIAN, ESQ., SBN: 168925 DOUMANIAN & ASSOCIATES 2 837 South Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 200 Pasadena, California 91105 3 Telephone (626) 795-5802 Facsimile (626) 795-5832 4 Email: nancy@nancylaw.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant, PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a public entity, 6 PUBLIC ENTITY DEFENDANT, NO FILING FEE PER GOV’ T. CODE § 6103 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 JANE DOE, a minor, by and through her CASE NO. BC662842 guardian ad litem, KATHRYN T. [Assigned to the Hon. Malcolm H. Mackey, 12 MCGUIGAN, Dept. 55] 13 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 14 v. 3 TO ALLOW COUNSEL TO DISCUSS SPECIFIC SUMS DURING VOIR DIRE, 15 PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL AND STRIKE FOR CAUSE JURORS DISTRICT, BRIAN MCDONALD, in His WHO STATE THAT THEY CANNOT 16 Official Capacity as Superintendent of AWARD A SUM FOR DAMAGES EVEN Pasadena Unified School District, FOCUS IF THE EVIDENCE PROVES IT 17 POINT ACADEMY, MICHAEL BELL, in His Official Capacity as Principal of Focus DATE: APRIL 29. 2022 18 Point Academy, KELLY RANEY, in Her TIME: 8:30 AM Official Capacity as Teacher at Focus Point DEPT: 55 19 Academy, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, LOS ANGELES FSC: APRIL 29, 2022 20 DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, TRIAL: MAY 9, 2022 ROE 1, A MINOR, ROE PARENT 1-5; ROE 21 2, A MINOR, AND ROE PARENT 6-10, ROE 3, A MINOR, AND ROE PARENT 11- 22 15, AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, 23 Defendants. 24 25 COMES NOW Defendant PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and hereby 26 submits this opposition to Plaintiff JANE DOE’s motion in limine to allow counsel to discuss 27 28 -1- DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 TO ALLOW COUNSEL TO DISCUSS SPECIFIC SUMS DURING VOIR DIRE, AND STRIKE FOR CAUSE JURORS WHO STATE THAT THEY CANNOT AWARD A SUM FOR DAMAGES EVEN IF THE EVIDENCE PROVES IT