arrow left
arrow right
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JANE DOE VS PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/23/2022 08:30 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Salcido,Deputy Clerk 1 P ANISH I SHEA I BOYLE IRAVIPUDI LLP BRIAN J. PANISH, State Bar No. 116060 2 panish@psblaw.com DAVID RUDORFER, State Bar No. 254666 3 rudo1-fer@psblaw.com WYATT A. VESPERMANN, State Bar No. 322865 4 vespermann@psblaw.com 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700 5 Los Angeles, California 90025 Telephone: 310.477.1700 6 Facsimile: 310.477.1699 7 SHERIE. MANUWAL, State Bar No. 106305 ROBERT I. MANUWAL, State Bar No. 102781 8 MANUWAL & MANUWAL 100 N. Westlake Boulevard, Suite 203 9 Westlake Village, CA 91362 Telephone: 818.715.6040 10 Facsimile: 818.715.6030 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 13 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 14 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 15 16 "JANE DOE", a person with a disability by Case No. BC662842 and through her Guardian ad Litem 17 KATHRYN T. MCGUIGAN, [Assigned to Hon. Judge Patrick Madden, Dept. S28] 18 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 19 v. MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 10 TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE 20 PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ARGUMENT OR TESTIMONY THAT a public entity; FOCUS POINT ACADEMY, PLAINTIFF WAS NEGLIGENT AND 21 a public entity; BRIAN MCDONALD, an RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SUBJECT individual; MICHAEL BELL, an individual; SEXUAL ASSAULT; MEMORANDUM 22 KELLY RANEY, an individual; COUNTY OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, LOS 23 ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL [Complaint filed: 05/25/2017] HEALTH, a public entity; and DOES 1 [Trial Date: 05/9/2022] 24 through 50, Inclusive, 25 Defendants. 26 27 28 1 PLAINTIFF'S R.EPLYIN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE No. 10 To EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE ARGUMENT OR TESTIMONY THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NEGLIGENT AND RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SUBJECT SEXUAL ASSAULT