On May 25, 2017 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Mcguigan Kathryn T.,
and
Academy Focus Point,
Bell Michael,
County Of Los Angeles,
Los Angeles Department Of Mental Health,
Mcdonald Brian,
Pasadena Unified School District,
Raney Kelly,
Roe Parent 11-15,
Roe Parent 1-5,
Roe Parent 6-10,
for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/23/2022 08:30 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Salcido,Deputy Clerk
1 P ANISH I SHEA I BOYLE IRAVIPUDI LLP
BRIAN J. PANISH, State Bar No. 116060
2 panish@psblaw.com
DAVID RUDORFER, State Bar No. 254666
3 rudo1-fer@psblaw.com
WYATT A. VESPERMANN, State Bar No. 322865
4 vespermann@psblaw.com
11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700
5 Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: 310.477.1700
6 Facsimile: 310.477.1699
7 SHERIE. MANUWAL, State Bar No. 106305
ROBERT I. MANUWAL, State Bar No. 102781
8 MANUWAL & MANUWAL
100 N. Westlake Boulevard, Suite 203
9 Westlake Village, CA 91362
Telephone: 818.715.6040
10 Facsimile: 818.715.6030
11 Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
13 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
14 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
15
16 "JANE DOE", a person with a disability by Case No. BC662842
and through her Guardian ad Litem
17 KATHRYN T. MCGUIGAN, [Assigned to Hon. Judge Patrick Madden,
Dept. S28]
18 Plaintiff,
PLAINTIFF'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
19 v. MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 10 TO
EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE
20 PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ARGUMENT OR TESTIMONY THAT
a public entity; FOCUS POINT ACADEMY, PLAINTIFF WAS NEGLIGENT AND
21 a public entity; BRIAN MCDONALD, an RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SUBJECT
individual; MICHAEL BELL, an individual; SEXUAL ASSAULT; MEMORANDUM
22 KELLY RANEY, an individual; COUNTY OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, LOS
23 ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL [Complaint filed: 05/25/2017]
HEALTH, a public entity; and DOES 1 [Trial Date: 05/9/2022]
24 through 50, Inclusive,
25 Defendants.
26
27
28
1
PLAINTIFF'S R.EPLYIN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE No. 10 To EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE ARGUMENT OR
TESTIMONY THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NEGLIGENT AND RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SUBJECT SEXUAL ASSAULT
Document Filed Date
May 23, 2022
Case Filing Date
May 25, 2017
Category
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Jury Verdict 08/23/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.